Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Same here mate, been gaming at 4K since 2014. Best part is, even with the optimised settings it looks better than 1440p at maximum settings. But back then people pretended they couldn’t see the difference between 1440p and 4K. Now they are all upgrading in droves and finally admitting that it is better
Trouble is you can count on one hand the number of PC monitors with either OLED or FALD.
Speculation aside, at the end of the day I don't want to play a game where everything is so pitch black I can't see a damn thingSimple: 2018 is during night time (or the lighting of the scene is faulty), 2020 is during day (Sun is up and to the right, judging by the shadow on that wall, so light comes from the front). Also, most likely in 2020 demo, the car is under/inside some sort of passage/bridge. Also, I guess the back window could turn "solid" if they so desire (see the demo with the "solid" windows when he gets inside and after he turns the car on they turn "clear"). It's perfectly valid.
PS: Just because RT can simulate how natural light works, it doesn't mean that the way it does in real life/game is desired by the artist composing the scene. Film studios or even a simple photographer could need quite a bit of equipment to light a scene properly for the dramatic effect that he's after. So if they don't add extra light somehow in the scene while using RT, although the light is natural/correct, it possibly could not be as dramatic as intended using the original lighting sources. That's why, I guess, having 2 ways of doing stuff (RT + faking it), can be troublesome in trying to maintain the same overall mood within the same scene.
The 2018 version seemed to be on the dark side, but watchable. The 2020 version (on this IPS display) is virtually pitch black.
A brand new and unreleased bleeding-edge game stressing older 4 year old GPU's without specific RT capabilities.... fancy that.Didn't even have all the RT on, and was even dropping under 30 in some places, in less than 1080p, ouch!
https://wccftech.com/cyberpunk-2077...dlss-2-0-enabled-on-an-rtx-2080ti-powered-pc/
Didn't even have all the RT on, and was even dropping under 30 in some places, in less than 1080p, ouch!
https://wccftech.com/cyberpunk-2077...dlss-2-0-enabled-on-an-rtx-2080ti-powered-pc/
A brand new and unreleased bleeding-edge game stressing older 4 year old GPU's without specific RT capabilities.... fancy that.
2080's are also poor at RT, common knowledge and a weakness of the Turing series that will become apparent with new games. I would expect that this game runs pretty badly on a 2080Ti and great on a new-gen card because from what I have seen it is looking truly next-gen and something worth upgrading for.
They've been very good at keeping us completely in the dark, so who knows.
(And in fairness AMD will be only too happy to follow where nV lead )He does not care, he has an OLED. Nana nana na na!
This is true. Deus Ex Mankind Divided can be very hard to run, yet if you optimise the settings you can have the game look damn near as good where you need still shots to see the difference and gain a lot of fps. As I recall the main culprit is Contact Hardening Shadows which is meant to be more realistic shadows, but is it worth the huge fps drop? As I recall it was like 40% or more drop in fps. That is like the difference between a 1070 and 1080Ti. I would rather have the 1070 running cooler and quieter and have that option off
I find that in most games going from very high to ultra settings have a huge impact on fps with very little improvement in image quality, there are exceptions, but mostly it is this way. That is why I get away with a xx70 class GPU’s by tweaking settings on new and demanding games
Speculation aside, at the end of the day I don't want to play a game where everything is so pitch black I can't see a damn thing
... or maybe we need better, HDR monitors. If it truly is a next-gen engine (like Crysis was in its day) with RT properly implemented, then I assume we can expect a heavy penalty on older generation cards.
According to reports it will have over double the RT cores. As far as I know, RT capability is not dictated by memory bandwidth.
It won't be unless tons of Pascal and Turing owners complain about performance. Saw what happened with W3,Kepler owners complained for months,AMD owners complained for months and eventually CDPR patched the game,and added extra options. They basically implemented Gameworks features months before release,as it was sponsored by Nvidia.
CDPR is also delaying "the next generation" console version until 2021,so it would be funny if performance was patched months after release....the same as with W3!
Yeah CDPR are soo lazy
Your memory is failing you, that isn't what happened. The keplar issues were nVidia's doing, and nVidia fixed it with a driver update, 353.06 to be exact. None of that had anything to do with CDPR. The options that were added were related to hair tessellation, something that affected almost everybody but it's worth noting the tessellation amount was already configurable in an .INI file - it just wasn't in the game at release.
Yeah CDPR are soo lazy
