• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia Readies New “Ultimate” Technology

Smurfy said:
Its real easy to **** off, but for me its the logical evolution of SLI.
Thats not to say its not going to be owned by people with money to burn and for bragging rights, but there is to my mind a legitimate market for it.

Running big monitors requires a huge amount of gfx power 2 sli 8800 GTX's has slow down in many of todays games at res's of 2560 x 1600.

Is it worth the money? For the vast majority it wont be.
But after playing on a 30" monitor id pay a fair bit to keep playin on one.
Click to expand...

Maybe a point but the next gen card is meant to be 2 -3 times quicker than a 8800 GTX so if true and come Feb, one of those will beat a 8800 GTX SLI and maybe even a tri SLI 8800 GTX. A lot of money to spend for 3 months of high res gaming IMO.
 
isnt there someone on here who already uses a car rad for watercooling, has it bolted to the side of his desk or something...probably cheaper than a pc spec rad aswell....not that i know anything about watercooling, other than its tempted me a few times
 
the power supply bfg are working on....

TVA_Nuclear_628583251.jpg
 
the worse part about this triple card config is just imagine the amount of memory that gets wasted, 3 x gtx cards will only be showing the single cards ram aroumd of 768mb. not good that, and even worse if the 1gb 2900 cards end up in triple config.
will have plenty of gpu power but the ram may become the limiting factor when that much gpu power is available.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom