Astonished at how many people seem in awe of NGOHQ's response and how NVidia were "owned" by it.
Err, what?
The response is poorly worded, even allowing for English not being their native tongue. It has spelling mistakes and grammatical errors everywhere, repeats itself ad nauseum and rants on endlessly about how just about everything NVidia does is illegal. NGOHQ come across as a child having a strop in that response tbh.
Personally I'm with NVidia on this one, regardless of how poor or manipulative their driver support is, this doesn't give anyone else the right to modify their drivers to allow them to install on non-supported hardware, as problems arising from their use will inevitably reflect badly on NVidia.
Err, what?
The response is poorly worded, even allowing for English not being their native tongue. It has spelling mistakes and grammatical errors everywhere, repeats itself ad nauseum and rants on endlessly about how just about everything NVidia does is illegal. NGOHQ come across as a child having a strop in that response tbh.
Personally I'm with NVidia on this one, regardless of how poor or manipulative their driver support is, this doesn't give anyone else the right to modify their drivers to allow them to install on non-supported hardware, as problems arising from their use will inevitably reflect badly on NVidia.