• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***** OcUK 3D MARK 06 TOP-LIST (V3.0) *****

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was just curiouse thats why I asked, I'm not lazy or retarded I have no problems using a form.

but it seems you do have problems reading.......

are you retarded?

that was a question, not a statement - although to be fair you've certainly made it very clear to me what the answer is now....

me in the first post of thread said:
the database allows one record per user. if you need to edit any details, such as hardware/clockspeeds/score, or you just have a higher score to submit, then use the form again and it will overwrite your last result.

that text hasn't changed for weeks now. what makes you so special?
 
Sounds about right Ed, try 05 also

Stephen, thats impressive for such cheap cards. Is 3 or 4x crossfire possible yet?

dunno for sure being a xfire virgin, but there are 2 xfire connectors on each card so it looks physically possible, in fact I'm sure I saw 4 cards in a rig in som review recently
 
My motherboard supports crossfire fx (3-4 cards) but AMD/ATI are still working on the drivers, we will see full support Q1 next year.
 
The 3870s on the beta 7.11 out perform 880GT's (SLI) in crossfire mode, on the older driver they didn't.

With some driver maturing the 2x3870 (or even 3x) could be rather attractive.
 
i thought all 19in widescreen monitors could run 1280x1024. my nasty old 19in does it no problem. 06 ran at default settings - i didn't have to change a thing. :confused:

have you tried forcing windows to 1280x1024? although the desktop will look pap because it's stretched out of proportion, maybe it would allow the benchmark to run at the right settings?

Have tried mate.

The res's jump from 1280x800 to 1360x768 :(
 
Cant you just edit it and change the number to 13208 lol? Or even better allow people to modifiy there listing on that site if possible?
For people to update their own scores, you'd need to use a php or cgi script, which would also makes it possible for the score tables to be updated instantly (like the one in my sig).
It would be cool if OcUK allowed such a table to be appended to this forum, so everything would always be up to date and no need for anyone to maintain it.
 
For people to update their own scores, you'd need to use a php or cgi script, which would also makes it possible for the score tables to be updated instantly (like the one in my sig).

that's exactly what my form does. except some people can't be bothered to use it and think i should edit my database for them manually. :p
 
but it seems you do have problems reading.......



that was a question, not a statement - although to be fair you've certainly made it very clear to me what the answer is now....



that text hasn't changed for weeks now. what makes you so special?

I never read it so I asked, I admit I should have paid attention but its still does not mean you can unsult me and I know you asked me but as far as I'm concerned thats as good as insulting me, you also called me a lazy git which I am not, as I said I have no problems using the form, but I dont apreciate you insulting me which you have done.
 
that's exactly what my form does. except some people can't be bothered to use it and think i should edit my database for them manually. :p
Ah, I hadn't noticed you added an online database. I made the page in my sig for the same purpose, but I was told it was against the rules to make a thread about it :(.
 
He asked if you were a retard, then he says he knows you are in the line i quoted, I'm just saying i think hes being unnessarily harsh on you, no need for it, just forgive and forget.
 
scores updated. exus, your compare url was invalid so it was deleted. feel free to submit it again when you have a working compare url. :)
 
..and gurusan takes the top single card X1900 score :D

# SCORE USERNAME CPU DETAILS GPU DETAILS
1 14009 SS-89 intel q6600 @ 3330mhz ati 2900xt 512mb @ 860/970
2 13671 jbloggs intel q6600 @ 3600mhz ati 2900pro 512mb @ 840/976
3 13479 Noble intel q6600 @ 3300mhz ati 2900xt 1024mb @ 843/1005
4 13195 bbspeed intel q6600 @ 3300mhz ati 2900pro 512mb @ 820/909
5 12762 Fothsn intel qx6700 @ 3500mhz ati 2900xt 512mb @ 850/1000
6 12427 TheOtherOption intel q6600 @ 3329mhz ati 2900pro 512mb @ 752/909
7 8123 gurusan intel q6600 @ 3648mhz ati x1900xt 512mb @ 748/855
8 7503 Cob intel q6600 @ 3720mhz ati x1900xt-x 512mb @ 688/792
9 6013 benjo intel q6600 @ 3500mhz ati x1800xt 512mb @ 702/846
 
Seems about right, maybe up to 800-1000 points off.

3DMark06 is very CPU dependant, and makes use of as many cores as you can throw at it. This is why you gain 2000-3000 points just by changing to a quad-core.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom