**OcUK Crysis 1680x1050 VERY HIGH Settings Top List**

[Amidar]

Ok then

I get 34.815 FPS with my GX2 overclocked, and 31 FPS at stock. My specs are in sig.

But because of a driver bug i cant take a screenshot while in SLI mode with the GX2. And if i disable SLI while keeping the Crysis benchmark tool window open, it makes the window go too small and then i cant resize it to display the FPS part.

Use "Screen hunter" worked fine for me.

 

[chaparral]

32.08fps

 

[silversurfer]

I wonder how a humble 2900xt would do but considering its 512bit would that help much

 

[gurusan]

I wonder how a humble 2900xt would do but considering its 512bit would that help much

couldn't hurt that's for sure.

 

[willhub]

Nice to see I'm the highest in my class for once , wonder what server 2008 will do .

 

[RavenXXX2]

I couldn't have willhub above me in this list so i went and done the bios update to up the voltage and low and behold i got a better OC, the fps ain't much but its enough.

 

[gurusan]

ooh willhub, he beat you by 5 thousandths of a FPS...the competition is on!

 

[willhub]

17.59:

 

[wuyanxu]

you sure those are the maximum overclock of your G92's, cos it really isn't that impressive, i thought G92's should beat G80 in Crysis.

here's a taste of what REAL graphics card should do:
(NOTE: the minimal FPS is higher than most of ATI's x2 solutions, and matching some of the 9800Gx2 minimal)

oh yes, i now top the single GPU section.
just waiting for some volt-modded Ultra to beat me, or someone with better overclock on their GTX.

 

[willhub]

you sure those are the maximum overclock of your G92's, cos it really isn't that impressive, i thought G92's should beat G80 in Crysis.

here's a taste of what REAL graphics card should do:
(NOTE: the minimal FPS is higher than most of ATI's x2 solutions, and matching some of the 9800Gx2 minimal)

oh yes, i now top the single GPU section.
just waiting for some volt-modded Ultra to beat me, or someone with better overclock on their GTX.

No thats about the average overclock on a GT, the GTS's clock to 800+ and whilst the GT/GTS is on par with the 8800GTX in a lot of things we're doing 1680x1050 DX10 Very High here and the GTX has a 384bit mem interface and higher memory, and its a GT, not GTX.

Min fps is higher than it says, that min fps is due to a loading stutter whilse the minimal fps actually was around 13fps.

 

[CliffyBiro]

Nice to see the E6600 and 8800GT combo doing well. Can't wait to finally get mine together.

 

[RavenXXX2]

17.63

 

[gurusan]

(NOTE: the minimal FPS is higher than most of ATI's x2 solutions, and matching some of the 9800Gx2 minimal)

The only reason your minfps is so high is because you have 4gb ram....

 

[willhub]

The only reason your minfps is so high is because you have 4gb ram....

Dunno I have 4GB ram too.

17.63

You know I fly the white flag, you've got way more headroom in the core and mem, 700/1000 is maxed, allthough when server 2008 is on I'll give it another shot .

 

[gurusan]

oh yeah, actually it looks like pretty much everyone here has 4gb except for me

My minfps is 1.68 lol ...definitely hurtin the average

 

[marc2003]

updated.

Fifer, your score got deleted. you need to use the same benchmark tool as everyone else. the link is in the first post.

 

[PCZ]

37.305 fps
E8500 4333mhz
8800GTX x2 SLI
632 1000 1566

 

[ajones32]

Seems a bit odd compared to others, but i assure you no trickery involved.

 

[chaparral]

Seems like people are getting a few extra FPS went set to 32bit....

I give my system a test set to 32bit tomorrow and see if it makes any difference...

 

[Antx777]

32ish



~Ant