A read for the people who are still pining their hopes on DLSS. Like I said since the beginning, no better than reducing render scale, and not on par with native res. I wanna say, hope DLSS 2x does better, because that's what's more interesting to me, but seeing as it's not even available in a demo let alone a game, yeah...
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
OcUK Nvidia RTX series review thread
- Thread starter CAT-THE-FIFTH
- Start date
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,063
- Location
- In a house
Not even 5 mins, must be very in depth 0_o.
Overall, meh. About 5-6 fps faster than an FE at 4k in the odd game and that's it. Difference being you can actually buy an FE now, msi would apparently prefer to send cards to reviewers instead of etailers.
Either reviewers have misunderstood DLSS or I have.
If I assume I have misunderstood it and its supposed to be a simple replacement for TAA which in itself is just a crappy post processing AA technique (its better than FXAA but nothing like proper AA such as MSAA) then a big LOL.
I thought DLSS was much more and was akin to something like SGSSAA, so e.g. rendering at say 1440p and getting 2160p quality. But is it instead you still render at 4k and it just replaces TAA, TAA in itself is very light on gpu's anyway. In FF15 on my gpu TAA barely adds 2% load.
--edit--
Ok seems I was right then.
So DLSS is fairly good then if they struggling to spot the difference between native 4k + TAA and 1440p+DLSS. I think the article writers need to stop calling it 4k DLSS to avoid confusion.
If I assume I have misunderstood it and its supposed to be a simple replacement for TAA which in itself is just a crappy post processing AA technique (its better than FXAA but nothing like proper AA such as MSAA) then a big LOL.
I thought DLSS was much more and was akin to something like SGSSAA, so e.g. rendering at say 1440p and getting 2160p quality. But is it instead you still render at 4k and it just replaces TAA, TAA in itself is very light on gpu's anyway. In FF15 on my gpu TAA barely adds 2% load.
--edit--
Ok seems I was right then.
So DLSS is fairly good then if they struggling to spot the difference between native 4k + TAA and 1440p+DLSS. I think the article writers need to stop calling it 4k DLSS to avoid confusion.
Last edited: