BillytheImpaler said:Shouldn't option(1), the P4 option, have an Intel CPU rather than an AMD X2 3800+?![]()
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44284/442840cb47683ba3b062549a3d129cf5ad88a3f4" alt="RedFace :o :o"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2e7/3c2e7078a9869e9d518813af2d0fa6f2837eea4d" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
All sorted out now. Thats what I get for trying to do things the easy way < Crtl-A, Ctrl-V, Crtl-P > .. Opps.. lol
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44284/442840cb47683ba3b062549a3d129cf5ad88a3f4" alt="RedFace :o :o"
.
BillytheImpaler said:Shouldn't option(1), the P4 option, have an Intel CPU rather than an AMD X2 3800+?![]()
I'm not so sure that is the way to approach it, especially with the new dual core processors. I'd say that PPD < if we are talking strictly F@H> would be the approach to take.Joe42 said:Found an interesting article: We should calculate £/mhz in order to find the best value cpu as in the first article.
KE1HA said:My thought on the processors was rather simple. With either an X2 or a P4, we'd get nealy 2x the output for the same amount consumption. < if not less, allthough I havent done a formal study on power consumption v.s. ppd on the wu's >.
I know the rack seems overkill, but if we're to convience somebody to fess up 10 to 15 amps of power 24x7 .. they will probably want it to look the part and fit in somwhere appropriate, but ya never know.
As for the Modular PSU, it did cross my mind to run 4 systems < I've found some commercially made power splitters > from one 650W PSU and we don't need all the wire's and crap hanging around to do nothing but disrupt air flow. But point taken on the addiditnoal costs. In a case where your hammering the PSU's quality is important for long term performance & stability.
.
BillytheImpaler said:Mr. Mattus, are you on the beta team? If so you'll see the new QMDs before the rest of us do. You'll have to give us a full report when it comes time.
Not if we're only interested in p4's.Biffa said:Exactly £/mhz is a useless measure now days with lower mhz cpu's beating higher mhz ones in most cases.
Wouldn't it be easier to keep cool without the rackmount? That way you would have more space, and could have each pc sitting on a shelf in the open air. I know its a bit untidy and such but it ought to be cooler and cheaper...An example of power/heat...
42U rack + 10 DL385s with two operon 275s sucks ~15KW and kicks out over 26K BTU/hr. So that'sa good eight 600cfm in the back of the rack... not to mention the additional A/C requirements..
Joe42 said:Not if we're only interested in p4's.
Add up the clock speed for dual cores to get a total, and that ought to act as a fairly good measure of folding performance, as long at its all the same core/architecture.
Then we can use that to calculate a £/mhz number for each processor to find the best one.
Wouldn't it be easier to keep cool without the rackmount? That way you would have more space, and could have each pc sitting on a shelf in the open air. I know its a bit untidy and such but it ought to be cooler and cheaper...
NickK said:An example of power/heat...
42U rack + 10 DL385s with two operon 275s sucks ~15KW and kicks out over 26K BTU/hr. So that'sa good eight 600cfm in the back of the rack... not to mention the additional A/C requirements..
PhilthyPhil said:Well he said 10 dual rigs use 15kW so that 1500 W per rig... which is still a hell of a lot.