OCZ Agility

Soldato
Joined
13 May 2003
Posts
11,865
Location
Hamilton
There's bits and pieces of news appearing on the net about it, and some of it is wrong. So I thought I'd post up what's known about the drive.

It comes in 30GB, 60GB, 120GB flavours.

Performance for sequential and IOPS/random speeds is roughly 70% of Vertex.

It's made with slower NAND and has an Indilinx controller.

Up until now the Indilinx(OCZ and SuperTalent), new Samsung, and Intel drives are pretty much the only drives that offer performance in all areas that match or exceed the fastest SATA mechanical drives. Other SSD drives are faster or as fast in most aspects, but can fall down badly on random reads/writes. The result is that for us consumers we have to buy a very high performance drive, at a high price... because there's no middle ground.

The Agility closes that middle ground. It will yield exceptional performance at a more affordable price. At 70% of the speed you would not notice the difference in real use between a Vertex and an Agility, unless you were doing the same task over and over, or you benched it.

I don't know what the retail price will be. It will of course be cheaper than the Vertex.

I don't know when retail will be, samples will apparently be arriving very soon. So at a guess I'd say in roughly a month.

It will support OCZ Wiper out of the box, so performance will last on it.

Some FUD that's appeared is that it's an internal RAID SSD. It isn't.

If I was offered the choice between the Vertex and the Agility, I'd personally opt for the Agility to save a few quid. I have the Vertex drives, since they were available at the time I bought...
 
I've had one Vertex, then a second in RAID0. And now because of "dirty cells" I benchmark a little over 50% performance. I can't really tell the difference, so I think the Agility sounds pretty good.
 
due to the access times of SSD, most of the times its not the Speed that the data is transfered at thats why i think not much point in raiding up SSDs more so if its samsung vertex or falcon, as they have 200MB/s read speeds, most games do not benefit from raid due SSDs access times eveyr thing is accessed strate away COD4 the map load bar justs moves from one side to the other not stuttering or pauses and does it fast considering i only have an corsair s128 tis data rates are reported around the same speed of an HDD but access times is what beats it on the SSD

The access times as well as sequential data transfer rates decline, and are restored by wiper.
 
Hi

Is it defo called the agility as iv seen a new ocz drive over here(moved t oz) thats called the summit which is about $60 cheaper than the vertex but unsure if it would be the sensible choice or do i wait a little longer.Never seems to be the ideal time t take the plunge with rumours of price cuts and new drives just around the corner.Would post a link to it but unsure if forum rules prevent this

There's 3 OCZ drives that have been talked about. The Summit is a Samsung rebadge with custom firmware that's due out soon. The Agility is an Indilinx with lower cost NAND. The Collosus is a concept drive that they made which is essentially two Vertex in internal RAID.
 
That's true Danneh. But up until this point there's no drives with low transfer rates and high IOPS. JMicrons had the high transfer rates. Indilinx/Intel/New Samsung have both high transfer rates and high IOPS.
 
Back
Top Bottom