• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official 3D Mark 11 scores**

Phage said:
As a relative noob to this - Wouldn't it make sense to divide the group of results into 4/4, 4/8, 6/12 threads ? Seems to make a big difference on otherwise very similar setups.
Click to expand...

This is why I wanted links because that way any one who feels they are under performing, can go and look at what is different. Myself for example can't get any higher than around 10025...This puzzled me, so I clicked on someone with the same card as me and see we was scoring the same (ish) on GFX score but he left me standing with physics score.

I don't want to lose the element of competition but common sense needs to be used when comparing scores.

Locky bud, can you give me the links to your scores please? As soon as you do I will add them :)
 
Last edited:
Phage said:
As a relative noob to this - Wouldn't it make sense to divide the group of results into 4/4, 4/8, 6/12 threads ? Seems to make a big difference on otherwise very similar setups.
Click to expand...

Yeah we don't want it turning into the heaven threa now do we :)

You keep mentioning about peoples scores with better CPUs bein down to CPUs.

Why don't you upgrade to keep up ?
 
gregster said:
Locky bud, can you give me the links to your scores please? As soon as you do I will add them :)
Click to expand...

I will have to re run the single card one as it's came up as 0 score on the compare thingy.

but added the link to the crossfire score.
 
This is an old link for Trifire.

3930k @ 4.6 & 7970 Tri fire @ 1200mhz

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/3605387

capture3yf.jpg



I will need to re run this with 12.2 drivers and with all the new hardware in my pc, should see the score increase by quite a bit.
 
gregster you may have to think about where to put this one. Its a GTX 690 running on 1 core at stock speeds. I did not oc it because all I wanted to know was if it would run the benchmark. In theory its a under clocked single GTX 680.

P 8968
Graphics score 8586
Physics score 13775
Combined score 7544

CPU 3960x @4.0
GPU clock 915mhz mem 6008mhz boost 1020mhz

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/4056481
 
Coulda logged two tables one for overall score and one for graphics (as it is a graphics card forum afterall).

This would take a large amount of effort to maintain and probably not worth it though.

I don't mind going back through the scores to create a graphics score table to date though. Let me know Gregster :)
 
Last edited:
Locky said:
I will have to re run the single card one as it's came up as 0 score on the compare thingy.

but added the link to the crossfire score.
Click to expand...

Thanks and I will update.

Kaapstad said:
gregster you may have to think about where to put this one. Its a GTX 690 running on 1 core at stock speeds. I did not oc it because all I wanted to know was if it would run the benchmark. In theory its a under clocked single GTX 680.

P 8968
Graphics score 8586
Physics score 13775
Combined score 7544

CPU 3960x @4.0
GPU clock 915mhz mem 6008mhz boost 1020mhz

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/4056481
Click to expand...

I will add it as a 680.

Rusty0611 said:
Coulda logged two tables one for overall score and one for graphics (as it is a graphics card forum afterall).

This would take a large amount of effort to maintain and probably not worth it though.
Click to expand...

I get bored on nights so might well do that. Not a given but I will see how it goes.
 
Rusty0611 said:
How low does the second clock? It's over 2K under my 680 SLI score although both are mine can clock to 1290 at a push.
Click to expand...

well GPU 1 will do 1360mhz on its own and GPU 2 will do 1280mhz ish on it's own. both less in crossfire. Hence running at 1250mhz in crossfire, I'm sure I could get higher, but cba :D
 
By a country mile! :)

Tonester0011 said:
It would put the 680s where they should (not including 8pack :P)
I'd quite like to see how each card is preforming without the aid of CPU, would take a while though...10 pages now :L
Click to expand...

I wouldn't mind. I'm sad like that :p. I'll crack on with it if gregster rightly can't be bothered :).

Kaapstad said:
I think you will find 8 Pack is still at the top of the leader board
Click to expand...

He didn't say anything to the contrary to be fair. He said 680's at the top (except 8pack).
 
Last edited:
Ok I was bored watching the Olympics and decided to do the GFX scores. Any score submitted without a validation link had been omitted. Only 1 main rule and that is to supply a link (I feel this is fair).

If the posters who have not given a link would like to edit the post with the link, I will update the score.

Any mistake I have made, please let me know.

Thanks again to all for taking part and keep them scores coming :)
 
gregster said:
Single GPU GFX Scores

1. Rusty0611 - 11816. 680.
2. F1aw1ess - 11371. 670.
3. Besty - 11358. 7970.
4. Alex 123 Fra - 11012. 670.
5. Xtremedetailz - 10851. 670.
6. Dave Beast - 10834. 7970.
7. Borley - 10732. 7970.
8. Tonester0011 - 10658. 7970.
9. Pgi947 - 10645. 7970.
10. Stanners - 10594. 680.

SLI/CF GFX Scores

1. Rusty0611 - 23006. 680 X 2.
2. Besty - 21707. 7970 X 2.
3. Locky - 20973. 7970 X 2.
4. BodgeITandRun - 19922. 7970 X 2.
5. [email protected] - 19859. 670 X 2.
6. Boomstick777 - 18837. 7970 X 2.
7. Tonester0011 - 19423. 7970 X 2.
8. Tommybhoy - 11800. 6950 X 2 (unlocked).
9. Stephen0011 - 7629. 6850 X 2.
Click to expand...

Rawr nVidia power :p. Makes a change after the mauling we get in Heaven 3.0.

Thanks muchly for compiling this list gregster :)
 
Why isn't 8 Pack at the top of the Graphics list with his score of 13482 or the crossfire with a score of 25847?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom