Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
first haswell for me
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6776661
Graphics Score 21693
Physics Score 12100
Combined Score 11151
Quote for addition thenfirst haswell for me
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6776661
Graphics Score 21693
Physics Score 12100
Combined Score 11151
Just to let you know, we will be updating the scores one way or another in Gregsters absence but I would appreciate that the matter of his suspension isn't discussed. Thanks
Could you put a link in the OP pointing to the post I am using to update the tables please.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=24525690&postcount=3610
Thanks
Weird, I ran 3mdark11 on the latest 320.49 beta drivers and scored 3.5k less Graphics score than last official drivers with the same clocks, etc - happens a lot when you don't clear out older drivers and install straight over - score is now back to normal after that.
Even when I had AMD GPUs over the many years I had similar issues. Can anyone in the know explain why that happens 'cos the only reason I can think of is older driver conflicts?
And thanks Kaapstad for updating the tablesand also to Admiral Huddy for the new link in OP to avoid confusing us
![]()
My score @ stock - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6792953
Clean driver install with BETA drivers - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6793080