• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official 3D Mark 11 scores**

Gregster said:
Scores added chaps :)
Click to expand...

Thanks,

Have re-run test as now overclocked using multiplier rather than turbo and a slight increase in CPU Vcore for stability.

Score has upped slightly

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8300194

3DMark Score - 13101

Graphics Score - 16620

Physics Score - 7933

Combined Score - 8134

Now I'm just debating whether I should play with the clock on my GPU, I probably won't unless I can get lower air temperatures in my case first.

*Edit 07/05*

I'm still looking at getting better and hopefully quieter airflow in my case soon, and may put an order in tomorrow for some Noctua fans to match up with my NF-F12s. But in the meantime I've done some further adjustments in bios and squeezed a little more out the test results again. Not enough of a difference to move anywhere on the table but always interesting to find little enhancements and stability (hopefully).

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8306833

Detailed scores

3DMark Score - 13165

Graphics Score - 16712

Physics Score - 7941

Combined Score - 8203
 
Last edited:
I've now gotten round to overclocking my Ram to 1866MHz with timings of 11-11-11-28-1T and it's stable.

3d Mark 11 result

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8320560


3DMark Score - 13360

Graphics Score - 16751

Physics Score - 8267

Combined Score - 8383

I'm still deferring on pushing up the GPU clock as it's only air cooled.

Edit 11/05

Have move uncore value up to 42 and seen the score improve again, am now just checking for stability all tests so far seem okay. My system didn't like the CPU frequency and uncore matched at 43.
 
Last edited:
Nickolp1974 said:
Again gone one higher but not valid :(

This ones valid though

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8269210

Score 18394
Gfx 19427 (over 500pts lower than my best but temps above 40c come into play, on win 7 for this)

Gpu 1350/1960
Cpu 4805ghz
Click to expand...

That seems quite high for the clocks used, I've not run this up with the latest drivers mind. What was the ram at / timings?
 
Yeah I wasn't aware W7 is far better in this. My physics seems far lower here. Graphics score I could understand as you'd probably be getting cleaner power than me for the same clocks. 1350 is probably the maximum I could run this bench at 1.212v
 
*** THIS IS NOT A SUBMISSION ***

heres one for comparrison with same clocks on gpu but running cpu @ 4790ghz with all power states enabled!!!! hopefully trying to keep water temps down to help the gpu, note the higher gpu score but this could be down to BCLK???
Either way think its good to get this clock on cpu and still have it clock down when not needed.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8318567


 
newhit said:
Got a couple of final Classy scores before I start torturing a 290X :) .


newhit....4930 @ 5411 (132x41) Phase........EVGA 780Ti Classy on chiller.....1475 / 2150........score 20057

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8206780

newhit....4930 @ 5292 Phase.....EVGA 780Ti Classy SLI on water......1420 / 2125.......score 29451

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8166374

I think they're alright :) .
Click to expand...

Awesome score!!! ;)




managed to eek a bit more using hotkeys to keep temps and volts down on gpu.

gpu test 2: 1350/2000
combined : 1365/2000
all others at : 1385/2000

cpu with power savings enabled 4818 GHz

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8318782

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom