• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official 3DMark 'Fire Strike' Leaderboard**

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1289471

3570k at 4.5ghz watercooled antec 620.
670 at 1250 boost and 1700 on the ram using latest 327.23 drivers

6314 score. Is this good? i had overclocked the gpu boost from standard boost of 1149 to 1250 tho i have pushed it all the way to 1320 i think but didnt wana push my luck in this one.

Firestrike detailed scores:

3DMark Score6314.0
Graphics Score7547.0
Physics Score5987.0
 
That physics score is very low for your clocks. I would set a guess at the OC isn't stable and is just working (but not efficiently). I skipped the Ivy, so can't help you on that but I am sure there will be plenty in the CPU thread who have the same or similar system as you and can offer some help :)
 
Gregster said:
You posted your score and then 11 hours later, asked if this thread ever gets updated. I am sure you wasn't meaning to be rude, but it looks that way :)

I do update every day but work gets in the way sometimes ;)
Click to expand...

Oh im sorry, i wasnt trying to be rude. Just didnt know since you didnt post saying you had updated it!
 
Hmm about my low physics score. In 3d mark 11 it seems to be about right i think on the physics side of things.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7178360

But in 3d mark it seems low? Wonder why 3d mark is giving me low physics score when 3d mark 11 gives a more or less proper score? Are you sure it isnt cos i ran it 32bit where others might have picked 64bit?

Btw posted in cpu section tho i dont think its my cpu overclock thats the issue per say.

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?p=25019881#post25019881

Edit - http://steamcommunity.com/app/223850/discussions/0/864959336477867509/ I know its old topic and all and its not exactly my problem but they do bring up a difference between free version and steam version physics score differences. I think ill try a non steam version and see how that goes, should i try 32bit in the free one or 64bit? I mean what does everyone else bench at 32/64?

Also i noticed i think the ice storm bench physics seem ok its just the other 2 that are low?
 
Last edited:
SkeeterUK said:
Hmm about my low physics score. In 3d mark 11 it seems to be about right i think on the physics side of things.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7178360

But in 3d mark it seems low? Wonder why 3d mark is giving me low physics score when 3d mark 11 gives a more or less proper score? Are you sure it isnt cos i ran it 32bit where others might have picked 64bit?

Btw posted in cpu section tho i dont think its my cpu overclock thats the issue per say.

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?p=25019881#post25019881
Click to expand...

On my FX 8350 i could reach 9500+ physics at 5.1GHz with proper RAM. RAM is VERY important for 3d11 physics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom