Oh this will be good news for my next upgrade as I need a decent Video Editing PC now.
This and Nvidias Fermi GPU![]()
![]()
You get paid waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Oh this will be good news for my next upgrade as I need a decent Video Editing PC now.
This and Nvidias Fermi GPU![]()
![]()
Nice chip, insane price. Was waiting on this chip to upgrade but I think I'll pass.. I wonder when more games start using more cores.
the impression i get with games, (not sure you will all agree with me here) they always seem to be manufactured with the consoles in mind first. Apart from crysis which has awfull coding and football manager, it would be nice to see games deveolped to get the most out of pc technology.
If im wrong about this then by all means correct me![]()
The XBox 360 has three physical cores each of which appears as two logical cores. That means that in order to get the most out of the hardware, games for that platform need to be written to use 6 threads. Similarly the Cell processor in the PS3 absolutely requires games to be written to use several threads effectively. It's not the console market that's holding things back with regard to multi-threading.the impression i get with games, (not sure you will all agree with me here) they always seem to be manufactured with the consoles in mind first. Apart from crysis which has awfull coding and football manager, it would be nice to see games deveolped to get the most out of pc technology.
The code that works with DirectX is only a small part of a game engine. To put a very rough figure on it, maybe 10% of a game's code could benefit from this. Sure, it's great if DirectX plays nicely and enables the parts of a game engine that call it to make use of several cores more easily, but that doesn't mean it is "a lot easier" for developers. The whole of the rest of their game engine will still have to be designed with several threads in mind and DirectX can't help with that. Not only that but it's going to be a while before the majority of developers can really expect to be designing exclusively with DirectX 11 in mind. There is too much DirectX 10, and even DirectX 9, hardware out there for that to be an option for a while to come. I guess what I'm really saying here is that people shouldn't expect miracles from DirectX 11.From what I understand of directx 11 it will be a lot easier for developers to make games that can use all multiple core CPU's so games that can use 4 or more cores might actually come around quicker then you realise.
It does sound like a great cpu, but theres no way i could ever justify spending £1000.00 on a single component.
It does sound like a great cpu, but theres no way i could ever justify spending £1000.00 on a single component.
Thats too expensive for me.
I want a 32 nm upgrade because my 920 is a lame overclocker, though it would have to be around £200-£250 so I can sell my I7 to cover the cost.
Arent there any cheaper 32 nm quads planned for I7?
That's roughly a 50% increase in video encoding performance over a similarly clocked i7�already no slouch by any existing standards.
The i9 processors won't ship until sometime in early to mid 2010, and when they do, expect them to be a bit on the expensive side. But man, 50%. I think I can stand to save up a few more bucks, honestly.
The XBox 360 has three physical cores each of which appears as two logical cores. That means that in order to get the most out of the hardware, games for that platform need to be written to use 6 threads. Similarly the Cell processor in the PS3 absolutely requires games to be written to use several threads effectively. It's not the console market that's holding things back with regard to multi-threading.
6 Cores! Meh!!!. Hardly use 4 cores let alone 6
Exactly. That`s a chip aimed at server initially, people would
be mad and stupid to buy that for a desktop. Not many apps use four cores now, and those that do often don`t use 100% of each.
Whats happened to your 920? im thinking of getting one
Slighty incorrect - I'm a "desktop user" and use my quad core and 8GB of RAM. I'm editing HD videos in Adobe Pr and the next machine I build/buy will have 12GB/16GB of RAM and this new i9