**Official OCUK SuperPI database**

It's all changed at the top:

1st: 4Qman: E8500 8.468
2nd: weescott: QX9650 8.98
3rd: Cupra: E8500 9.016
4th: Fornowagain: QX9650 9.735
5th: weescott: E8500 9.812
6th: kitfit1: E8500 9.813
7th: Monstermunch: E8500 10.062
8th: Khemist: E8500 10.250
9th: weescott: E8200 10.422
10th: wja96: E8400 10.516
11th: jbloggs: E8400 10.531
12th: Topitoff: E8400 10.719
13th: roller: QX6850 11.313
14th: weescott: Q6600 11.344
15th: Cupra: Q6600 11.484
16th: RaiderX303: Q6600 11.576
17th: Tom Nbk: E8400 11.641
18th: Jokester: QX6850 11.687
19th: weescott: Q9550 ES 11.812
20th: Devious: Q6600 11.875
 
Monstermunch said:
C'Mon Webbo, sort your act out & update the tables please m8 :rolleyes::p
Click to expand...


LOL Don't blame me m8, blame intel! Unless someone wants to donate a cheapo 775 mobo so I can access my HD's theres little I can do bar re-write all the databases again. Shouldn't be long now.

Come to think of it with all the latest entries I guess it would be just as much work to update the databases as to re-write them. I'll get on it;)
 
just a quick Q... if superpi crashes sometimes i.e. windows error says its not responding.. does that mean the system is not stable or just windows being picky? as its fine on orthos and is stable over 12 hours. and i can run superpi 1M but sometimes when i run it, it stops responding a few iterations in. and just to make clear its not the rounding error that appears its windows saying it has to close.
 
If orthos runs fine then its not a stability issue. super pi can act like that with an utterly unstable system but of course one second of orthos or prime will crash out the machine.
 
LMAO...Tell easyrider your PC is Orthos stable but not PI stable!!!

-----

I would guess its a Ram problem. Try running OCCT for your ram.
 
aww no it cant be my ram :( already had to rma it once and it got replaced and i memtested it the moment the new stick arrived. it is running at 1069 instead of 1066 but 3hz aint gunna do nowt :p and its running at the 2.2.

im sure its just something to do with windows as it runs superpi fine pretty much all the time :)

like im running orthos now and its been going on small fft over 3 and 1/2 hours and still going :) just ran superpi whilst orthos was running and i still got under 13 sec for 1M :D hehe
 
This is Ironic! Talking about stability testing in a SuperPI thread.

At the end of the day, some of these stability tests should not be relied upon so heavily.

/OT
 
Up until now I never bothered with hours long stability tests, would run the relevant amount of 32mb PI instances and an hour max of prime blend.

6 years of overclocking and many posts from easy insisting to run small fft I made the effort of getting my system 8 hours small fft prime stable and 4 hours memstest stable.

Has been fine for a week or to, and today after 4 hours of crysis it rebooted :mad:

In all the years of playing games on overclocked machines which haven’t been tested for "total stability" I’ve never had a game reboot my pc!

Screw 8-12 hour stability tests, they are a total waste of time and electricity!!

I’m with you weescott, PI is good enough for me now :D
 
1M or 32M :p which ya recommend to stop at?

oops sorry missed the first bit, so 32M and an hour of blend, job done :p hehe
 
Last edited:
Please keep the thread on topic - no talk about stability here just xtreme clockspeeds. There are plenty of threads regarding stability.:)

As for updates to the thread - I just won a new mobo so expect updates when it arrives early next week :).

Now for a quick Q - Do you think it would be a good idea to separate the 45nm cores from the 65nm as the newer cores have 3mb per core vs 2mb which gives a distinct advantage? Dual from Quad or just leave it as is?
 
w3bbo said:
Now for a quick Q - Do you think it would be a good idea to separate the 45nm cores from the 65nm as the newer cores have 3mb per core vs 2mb which gives a distinct advantage? Dual from Quad or just leave it as is?
Click to expand...

It’s not just the extra cache that helps. pi mod 1.5 is optimized for sse3 and as these new penryn have an improved micro architecture with supplemental sse2 and sse3 instructions we are seeing improvements in current apps that don’t even support the new sse4 instructions. In every way there just a more tweaked cpu.

But as far as the question is concerned I don’t think it’s that hard to distinguish between cpu’s so I don't see a real need to split them up. It’s not nearly as confusing a the 3dmark databases, with multiple gpu’s, different os’s etc...
 
w3bbo said:
Now for a quick Q - Do you think it would be a good idea to separate the 45nm cores from the 65nm as the newer cores have 3mb per core vs 2mb which gives a distinct advantage? Dual from Quad or just leave it as is?
Click to expand...

The Q9300 with 6mb cache throws that arguement out the window. :p
 
domyboy said:
Ok i would post my clock but i dont know how to put pictures on posts? :confused:
Click to expand...

go to a site like imageshack.us and upload it then where it says link for forum thumbnail forums 1 (or something like that, its one of the top links) copy and past that into the text box..
sohould read something like [url.........................url]
or go to the last link and just copy paste that into the text box, but be wary of its size, if its a high res it might break the rules so when ya upload you can always resize it abit :)
 
Username - JeffyB
Time - 11.625s
CPU - E8400
Clockspeed - 4005
Revision - C0
FP0#/Stepping - 6
Vcore (as per windows, not set in bios) - 1.28v
Motherboard - Maximus Formula
Memory - 2gb Crucial Tenth Anniversary
Vdimm - 2.2v
Frequency - 445
Latency - 4-4-4-12
Cooling - Tuniq Tower 120
Operating system - XP Pro sp2

 
Just to keep you all updated. My rig will be back up and running (fingers crossed) this thursday so expect an update thereafter. Sorry for the delays guys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom