Cyper in all honesty after having done a few runs I have to agree with the others that your score does look a little odd.
Let me explain.
I did the first run at 1330/1900, that's the same core clock as yours but with the memory 10MHz lower, yet I scored 33 points lower, and I have a 2600k running at 5.2GHz. I am also running the latest drivers that improve performance.
in addition, I also found that running the CPU a little higher did add a few points. So the extra 10 MHz on the memory not only gave you 33 points more but you are also running a i7 920, which brings me to the conclusion that you are scoring around 45-50 points more than I would with the same CPU with only a 10 MHz memory clock advantage.
Moving on, I just did another run. This time at 1345/1910, so the same memory clock as your score, but with the core 15MHz higher and with the faster CPU. Yet my score is still lower and I added only 23 points in total.
Using lower clocks and a slower processor you are scoring a good 10 points higher, while the rest of us have scores which are quite linear in the sense that my score and Matt's score look perfectly balanced given the clocks we are running and the CPU memory clocks etc.
At the same rate, the lads running x79 are always going to have to run their GPU clocks higher as this benchmark is almost entirely GPU bound and X79 tends to reduce graphics performance slightly when compared to dual channel socket 1155 running the same GPU clocks.
All in all, the rest of the scores are all balanced and linear, then we have your score which clearly sticks out considering your components and clocks.
I hope that made sense.