• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official Unigine Valley Leaderboard**

gregster said:
You don't like the power of them, so want to put them into a seperate category? I didn't like the power of the 7970 over the 680's but didn't put them into a sperate category because I didn't like it.

It is playing by the rules and is a single core GPU. Cost shouldn't come into it. Buy one or deal with it ;)
Click to expand...

gregster in absolutely right, the cost of the GPU is completely irrelevant.

I understand the argument, and i may add an extra category for low and mid tier performance GPU's, but i'm not separating Titan from the top end to create some sort of top top end category with Titan all on its own just because it more powerful than all the rest of the top end GPU's.

The 7970 seems to mullur the GTX 680 in almost all of these sort of benchmarks, thats no reason to separate it from them, neither is cost, a GTX 580 cost £400 not so long ago, its now beaten by a GTX 660TI which never cost anywhere near that much.

Edit, i'm going to sleep on the CYPER debacle.
 
Last edited:
CYPER, there are to many people in here who have tried to replicate your scores, some even with much higher clocks, and not one of them was able to pull it off.

Something is not right with your scores.

CCC have a whole host of tweaks that will over ride the application settings, such things do not show up in the results page, its very easy to tweak a few more points out of those applications just by adjusting any number of those CCC tweaks.

Given that none of the other 7970's, some with higher clocks and much faster CPU's can't touch you makes this a pretty open and shut case for me.

Your scores will not be added.

/:

I will get on and add the rest, but there is a lot to do and i'm actually at home right now, so i have limited time.

Please be patient, thank you :)
 
Fresh OS install might do it ^^^^ the registry can get clogged up after a while slowing memory mapping.

Diagro said:
Howed u manage to get that much of an increase since: StonerDude #2268 - 7970 @ 1330 / 1900
Your cpu is lower clocked and you only added 35mhz on the GPU.. What else did you do because that makes no sense to me o.O
Click to expand...

His score ties in with the other 6 above his old score (Other than 8 Pack who did his run on old drivers)

LtMatt has just hung himself...


Well done StonerDude.
 
Last edited:
Kaapstad said:
@humbug

I think you missed my score on post 327

Thanks
Click to expand...


Kaapstad said:
Squeezed out a few more on mine

GTX 690 x 2 @1076/1825/1170
3960X @5.0

00012.png


I don't think the drivers for quad sli are that good on this, the GPUs are not getting that warm.
Click to expand...


Yup, sorry... its added now :)
 
Lets not drag other posts from other forums into this one please, what people do or say here is all that matters here

Pages 16 and 17 updated.

@ Besty, incredible clock and score, i think your the man to beat.
 
Last edited:
All updated.

Boomstick777 and Gregster, +###Mhz means nothing to me, please add your actual clocks, Gregster i just need it for SLI :) Nice score BTW...

I also need your clocks Mr.Cookie :)

bakes0310, please turn off your iGPU in the BIOS, i can't add your score with Intel HD in the results, please see rules :)

Erm??? i think thats it....
 
All updated.

I cant figure out how you AMD guys are getting such high clocks without BSOD, its really bugging me now.

In the past i have found MSI AB BSOD my GPU even at stock, is there something else in my system that's causing this now?

Any of you guys run System Monitor II?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom