Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Could not find my old 1600p score so did another one
Four Titans @994/1789
3930k @5.1
Bring on the R9 290Xs.
Added
Hi there
Right guys, I got some voltage control, so I've done a benchmark run at 1200MHz core and 6400MHz memory, gives quite a substancial boost in performance over the 1060MHz core and 6000Mhz benchmarks I did this week.
Check them out here:-
Such a damn quick card, this now places it ahead of the 1310MHz GTX 780 I included in the review in all test.
Nice scores Kaap.
1080p 1x Titan 1175/1150 4960x 4.5
CBA to cherry pick out of the 3 this is the first time I've bothered trying to clock them singularly. So timid on the stock BIOS
I didn't, it's just the way the clocks are written. My clocks are what I set but if you add boost to them they go a lot higher.
You also need to change whyscotty's mem speed to 1502 as I think he was just running the stock clocks. Expect a big score from whyscotty anytime soon, well when he has paid the elec bill anyway.
Here is what my cards were doing behind the scenes, I just re ran the bench using the same GPU settings but with the CPU @5.0 (I wanted to make sure I finished the bench).
If you check out the GPU load, it is all over the place where the cards are bottlenecking even @1600p. This is something we are going to see more and more of as people buy R9 290 and 290Xs and use them in multi GPU setups.
while whyscotty said
and yet your posting about 18% higher scores, The application states 1379Mhz clearly thats what it is or what its spent most of the time running at, from here on what clock rates the application display is what will get added to the leader board.
