• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official Unigine Valley Leaderboard**

Hi, please can you update my score too?

Titan Tri SLi
1150/3055
4960X @ 4.5


59x6.png


Here you go Humbug :)

done, i think.....
 

You need to
A screenshot of the trees and flowers in the darkness at the beginning of the Bench will do, but HTML Browser results will not be added to the scoreboard.

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?p=23772105#post23772105

:)


All done.
 
If I ran @1080p I would score exactly the same on 4 cards due to the CPU bottleneck.

1440p and 1600p is going to be needed in this bench as I think the 290 and 290X will be huge sellers.

AMD need to work on Driver performance with this Bench, Gibbo's bench @ 1200Mhz ranks it 26, some 26% behind the top Titan, they score 57% higher than the highest 770 and 55% higher than the highest 7970.

Incredible scaling, Nvidia have the drivers absolutely spot on, twice the scaling of AMD's drivers.
 
I didn't, it's just the way the clocks are written. My clocks are what I set but if you add boost to them they go a lot higher.

You also need to change whyscotty's mem speed to 1502 as I think he was just running the stock clocks. Expect a big score from whyscotty anytime soon, well when he has paid the elec bill anyway.:D

Here is what my cards were doing behind the scenes, I just re ran the bench using the same GPU settings but with the CPU @5.0 (I wanted to make sure I finished the bench).

j6rb.jpg

If you check out the GPU load, it is all over the place where the cards are bottlenecking even @1600p. This is something we are going to see more and more of as people buy R9 290 and 290Xs and use them in multi GPU setups.

You said
All @994/1789
while whyscotty said
1006/6008
and yet your posting about 18% higher scores, The application states 1379Mhz clearly thats what it is or what its spent most of the time running at, from here on what clock rates the application display is what will get added to the leader board.
 
I have showed you the way the cards boost and none of them has ever got anywhere near 1379mhz, Valley is well known for reporting the clocks way higher than what they really are.

With 18% higher score than whyscotty i'm inclined to think they were running a hell of a lot higher than the sub 1Ghz you claimed.

What Haven reports is whats going in from now on, i don't see what the problem is with doing that.
 
Back
Top Bottom