Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jun 2009
- Posts
- 5,460
- Location
- No Mans Land
Don't bother with OLED till next year. This years models can't do HDR. But it does try hard but fails.
Utter crap. You don't have a clue what your talking about.
Don't bother with OLED till next year. This years models can't do HDR. But it does try hard but fails.
exactly. love my b6Utter crap. You don't have a clue what your talking about.
Utter crap. You don't have a clue what your talking about.
The LG OLED do HDR just fine. Yes some of the Sony lcd panels go brighter, but my LG b6 goes stupidly bright with some HDR content, squint inducingly so, couldn't see how I'd need it any brighter to be honest.
Plus OLED is just a lovely looking picture once you have it setup right. It took me around 6 years to swap tvs from my panny plasma, and that's just because nothing looked as nice. Until now anyway.
But isnt HDR about the colour RANGE rather than just brightness. I have to say I still went for the E6 and am going to watch Narcos tonight as a test.
But isnt HDR about the colour RANGE rather than just brightness. I have to say I still went for the E6 and am going to watch Narcos tonight as a test.
The 3:2 pulldown effect can cause issues, as the 24 frames don't fit evenly into 60 fps.
If I disable the pi from dropping the frame rate, then it outputs at 60fps or 3:2 pulldown.
No it's 23.976 fps.
23.976 is converted to 59.94hz "60hz" for your television using 3:2 pulldown which means repeat 3 frames, then repeat 2 averaging 2.5.
So how can OLED, with its brightness issues, qualify for HDR compatibility? Well, the UHD Alliance has got around the problem by introducing two standards, either of which qualifies you for UHD Premium status:
STANDARD 1: More than 1,000 nits peak brightness and less than 0.05nits black level.
STANDARD 2: More than 540 nits brightness and less than 0.0005 nits black level.
I have some empathy with deuse's point of view -
a quick "hdr standard oled lcd" google reminds us hdr-premium sticker has two variants
but on the otherhand 4k disks are mastered at HDR10 which can be in the vicinity of 1000nits.
so does that mean you cannot properly render all 4k disks on an oled ? riddle me that.
is there a database of brightness needed for different 4k disks (like the dynamic range db for cd's)
But isnt HDR about the colour RANGE rather than just brightness. I have to say I still went for the E6 and am going to watch Narcos tonight as a test.
I don't think HDR is brightness. Brightness is the black level.
You mean contrast (white level)
contrast is the difference between the two. ultra Hd premium defines two sets of minimums as has been mentioned however the interesting part is the contrast ratio. It's not explicitly defined although it obviously is defined because black and white levels both are: Option 1) 1000nit brightness and 0.05 black level = 1000/0.05 = 20,000:1CR. but option 2 (OLED) 540nit and 0.0005 black level = 1,080,000:1CR
So yeah, all very well saying OLEDs dont do HDR but with a contrast ratio like that (and 540nit is still bright) IMO on a PQ point of view alone, it's a done deal for OLED.
Viewing Environment ConsiderationsOne of the often overlooked potential issues with ST2084 based HDR for home viewing is that because the display's various brightness (backlight and contrast) controls are already maxed out on HDR TVs there is no way to increase the display's light output to overcome surrounding room light levels - as is often done with SDR home TVs to enable different configurations for Day/Night viewing.
This is an issue as UHDTV/HDR as the ST2084 standard is intended to enable the creation of images with an increased spectral highlight range, not to generate images with overall higher luminance levels.
As has been stated previously, this means that for most scenes the Average Picture Level (APL) of HDR material will match that of regular SDR (standard dynamic range) imagery. The result is that in less than ideal viewing environments, where the surrounding room brightness level is relatively high, the bulk of the HDR image will appear very dark, with shadow detail becoming very difficult to see, as the eye's constricted pupil will just not be able to discern shadow detail.
To be able to view HDR imagery environmental light levels will have to be very carefully controlled. Far more so than for SDR viewing
This whole article wouldn’t exsist if Dolby Vision had been out first…instead of a one time HDR on off for hdr10, it does constant dynamic metadata ….basically it’s way better,fact….im not saying hdr10 is gross, just not as good…why we should wait to buy tech….
I'm really tempted to buy the e6 myself although I've only had my current tv (Panasonic ax802) for just over a year which seems a bit mad, I've always wanted an oled since they first show up and I would be gaining 5" screen size plus HDR would it be a worthwhile upgrade?