OMG, star craft two in 3D

3d in games is not something I've ever paid attention to.
Do you need a 3d capable lcd like with tvs or can regular screens do it? I've got a 480 and got some 3d glasses at home from a trip to the cinema recently.

So far as playing PC games only nvidia offers 3D, but I read that ATI will be doing something too in the future.

For the nvidia system you need a 120Hz LCD monitor, or a 120Hz capable DLP projector. A projector is on my to-do list in the near future!

http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/GeForce_3D_Vision_Requirements_uk.html

It is true that the frame rate in games will be halved, but one thing I've found is that in 3D you can run at a lower resolution without noticing the pixels. Whatever the reason I was playing Metro 2033 last night at 1360x768 and the pixels were no more noticeable than in 2D at 1920x1080.

If you already have a compatible 120Hz screen (unlikely) then for just over £100 the Nvidia system is easily worth it IMO. Of course whether it's also worth the expensive of a new £300 screen depends what you want from your games.

In my opinion it is a gimmick, but in a good way. I don't often play games but when I do I enjoy the story and above all the atmosphere. This is where the 3D helps as a well designed environment just comes to life in 3D.
 
SC2 is rather awesome, and even with my average system runs great in 3D with settings cranked up to max. I just use the standard depth/convergence settings blizz preset - I find the effect is spot on.

Its not true that you loose 50% in all games - example for games that are CPU limited its less (GTA IV for example doesnt take that big a hit).

@OP if you have Medieval Total war 2 give it a go in 3d - you get that same kind of 'its real' effect where the units really look like they are tangable, touchable things right in front of you :P
 
@OP if you have Medieval Total war 2 give it a go in 3d - you get that same kind of 'its real' effect where the units really look like they are tangable, touchable things right in front of you :P

AHHHH damn it why did you have to write that :p

MTW2 is my favourite all time game would love to see a battle in 3d
 
NathWraith has recently invested in 3d vision and is loving it.

he keeps rattling on about how immersive the experience is.

in fairness we both game on 30" dells which take some beating, he was concerned about the reduction in res but he is pleased with his decision from what i can see.

he does report that his 480 SLI has to work hard though.

personally, its not for me. i have tried it many times and love the technology but dont think i could use it all the time
 
If i could find someone to take my 3d vision kit off my hands, id get rid of mine, i dont think my eyes are cut out for it.

I dont know if its because i have had laser surgery being a factor, but while i find it makes a huge difference to the immersion, the only games i find playable are the ones supported as 3d vision ready, tried starcraft there, and due to the menu's i couldnt play it in 3d.

Things like Metro 2033 and Batman are fantastic though, really feels like the graphics are real at times and it makes a huge difference.
 
Next graphics generation I hope to jump to 3D. Just need the hardware, sofware and the glasses to improve a bit more.
 
This is with the glasses right? It all just gives me a stinking great headache. I went to see Ice Age 3 at the cinema in 3D and ended up missing a load of it because I was in pain.

Same happens to me with games - watched some PC games in 3D at Eurogamer and the headaches returned.

Apparantly 1 in 10 people will not feel happy watching 3d with glasses and will feel pain. Unlucky mate,
 
gta 4 amazing, character up close not "quite" right but better than bad company 2 which was boring!

brings my system to its 15fps knees though, i need more of EVERYTHING lol
 
gta 4 amazing, character up close not "quite" right but better than bad company 2 which was boring!

brings my system to its 15fps knees though, i need more of EVERYTHING lol

Yeah, I find GTA4 looks amazing with the depth turned up, but that does lead to double images when things get close to the screen. If you haven't already, try adjusting the convergence (Ctrl F5 / F6 when enabled in nvidia ctrl panel) until the main character or car becomes a single image with the glasses off.

My i7 and GTX 460 just about cope - 20-40fps - I run it at 1440x900 and there's no noticeable drop in res through the 3d glasses - this improves the frame rate a lot.
 
I was an early adopter of Nvidia 3d and I am a big fan. While i dont game in 3d that often (as I am usually playing fast paced online games like Black Ops or playing 2 player games on the big TV) when I do get 3d going again and find a good game I am still blown away.

SC2 was something I was a little interested in, but reading how good it is in 3d makes me want to try it a whole lot more!

As for GTA4, I think this a very poorly designned engine and a shame as that spoiled a good game for me (anyone see the console version - pants engine!) Having 3d on does hit the system - even if you have hit the button to not use 3d! So combine a poor engine with an extra burden and it will be bad.
 
Do you need a new monitor to play games in 3D, or just a new graphics card + glasses?

EDIT: Cancel that, looking online quickly I see I'd need a new monitor, a 3D kit from NVidia and I suppose even my ATI HD4870 card won't cut it and needs replacin' :(
 
Last edited:
I am really intrigued by 3D gaming, but my nice new monitor and ATI gfx prevent me. Next gen round I think it will be time to make the switch.
 
it is VERY immersive in the right game.
most games are not perfect which is what you want/need for extended gaming sessions.

verdict from me therefore is that theoretically all games should go this way, it adds so much more and you cant get your head around it until you see it. games should be truly 3d ready however as its fun for now, but not a must have.

240hz oled panels would be awesome

hhmmm need to try prototype next...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom