Morning Peeps ,
Recently Started working for a Small Company of around 100 People but only 64 Users are working on devices. Everything in our Business is currently on prem . With there only been so little user base is there any point of being Cloud based ?
Thanks
This is a very subjective question depending on a multitude of things such as:
- What are your main files and applications e.g. AutoCad, Word, Excel, PDF, images
- What are the main systems in use e.g. Windows, macOS, Linux etc
- What is your current system/s e.g. Windows Server, some *Nix custom OS, various Linux distros etc
- What are your requirements from your existing and new system.
Generally speaking, I would argue that most small business'/SMEs work better when they are fully cloud as if they use something like Microsoft 365 with the Business Premium license then for £16-£18 pupm they get the following (All hosted):
- Email (Exchange Online)
- Device management (Intune)
- Email security (Defender for Office 365)
- Endpoint security (Defender for Business)
- File storage (SharePoint/OneDrive)
- Authentication/SSO (Entra/AzureAD)
It's a decent chunk of money per user per month but when you look that it reduces the amount of stuff on site that needs maintenance, support contracts etc it works out quite well and it keeps it all in one set of portals (However many times they may change)
That being said, it's not for everyone, the above works well if they are a "Standard" business that mainly uses Office series apps etc. If they were a CAD or graphics heavy company I would argue that retaining some on premises storage would be a good idea since those files tend not to play nicely with the likes of SharePoint etc. Likewise if they were based in a part of the country where internet offering is ADSL etc then retaining on-premises file storage would also make sense.
There's also other scenarios such as macOS centric environments which whilst they might work in the cloud you may need to use other cloud solutions such as Jamf to achieve what you want.
In short, there isn't a "one size fits all answer", it's something that will need looking into carefully, considering all options that are available such as hybrid approaches, different providers etc
Edit: I should also add that "cloud" can be all sorts of things from SaaS solutions such as Microsoft 365 & G-Suite to PaaS and IaaS solutions such as Microsoft Azure & AWS. Some organisations "lift and shift" a lot of their traditionally configured on-premises resources such as SQL instances, virtual machines, basic file storage etc to solutions such as Azure, AWS and G-Cloud. Again, there isn't a right and wrong answer but what I would say is that just moving IaaS/PaaS to the cloud can cost more money in the long run if it isn't planned and costed properly as the benefits really come in when you leverage SaaS and look to get away from the "box standard VM" aproach