one for failing in prime

crazyDAJT

crazyDAJT

crazyDAJT

Associate
Joined
20 Jun 2007
Posts
1,641
Location
Nottingham
hi all

I'm currently trying to get 3.5GHz out of my Q6600 G0 stable.

my current settings our

389X9
Vcore CPUz = 1.408
temps on prime small fft 61,61,56,56
memory running at 778, at stock timings of 5,5,5,18

now I ran it for 3-4hr's today at these setting using on small FFT with my memory slacked right off (as far as they could go)

I then tightened the timings back to stock ran bend, now after about an hour core 3 fails, but the rest are fine, no lockups, no BSOD.

I'm running small FFT now to see if it does the same.

is this pointing to a memory problem?? or should i add a notch to the Vcore in the BIOS

EDIT: it sames to be failing on small FFT as well, so i think i might back it off a touch as test the stability of a slightly lower clock, then more onto 3.5GHz tomorow
 
Last edited:
I am running the ram at stock, 1.8V, its two sticks of 2GB ram and i have already given my NB a bit of a bump.

my temps where getting a bit high in the middle of the day, up to 68 on the hottest one.It was failing in small FFT so i think it needed a bit more of a kick to get it stable. which i wasn't willing to do. so i have backed of a bit to 382X9=3438 and the vcore is now 1.38.

temps don't go above 61 on small FFT

i have run 3hr small FFT and 2hr bend. will run small FFT overnight to check it rock solid.

just a shame as I wanted a nice round 3.5GHz

any ideas of squeezing a few more MHz without raising the temps up to much?
 
Doppleganger said:
Improve your cooling and/or case airflow. To get higher MHz otherwise you're going to have to raise the vcore and therefore your temps will rise.
Click to expand...

I thought that was the only way. i am using low end water at the moment so i cant expect miracles.

ran prim last night 9hr-41mins. but core 3 failed again after 2hr's and 55mins. temps didn't go above 61C

I got this error

[Feb 10 02:39] FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.4951171875, expected less than 0.4
[Feb 10 02:39] Hardware failure detected, consult stress.txt file.
[Feb 10 02:39] Torture Test ran 2 hours, 55 minutes - 1 errors, 0 warnings.
[Feb 10 02:39] Work thread stopped.

does this help anybody to work out whats wrong??
 
8igdave said:
What sticks of ram do you ahve? Most require at least 1.9v
Click to expand...

this is my ram i use:

http://www.corsair.com/_datasheets/TWIN2X4096-6400C5DHX.pdf

it states 1.8V

I managed to get it stable at these settings

378X9=3402MHz
1.392Vcore
max temps 61,61,55,55

ram running at 907.2MHz at stock timings of 5-5-5-18

8hr+ stable

main.php


full size at this link



i think to get it any higher i have to significantly increase the Vcore and i don't want temps to hit the 80C mark. I think this is going to be my everyday overclock, I'm going to upgrade my water cooling in a bit, will lap the CPU and see how far i can push it then.

i might see if i can tighten my ram timings two, is bend the best way to test this??

EDIT: Any suggestions of where to go next?? I was also thinking of backing off the Vcore till it fails 8+hr's of prime, but i don't think i can lower it much more anyway.

EDIT: i fixed the link (well i think i have) please tell me if its not working
 
Last edited:
because youve overclocked your ram you may need them at 1.9v for full stability. Borth ocuk's modules in stock also state 1.9v

As for the bset awy to test, use memtest thats normaly the bset i beleive.

You dont need watercooling and remeber unless your decoding you will never ever put it at load and most games dont even use both cores. 80 degrees full load is still fine.


You can probalby lower that voltage. I have an annoyingly big V drop on my board of 0.1 so ive got 3.5ghz at 1.45 annd its doing fine at 1.35 real voltage
 
8igdave said:
because youve overclocked your ram you may need them at 1.9v for full stability. Borth ocuk's modules in stock also state 1.9v

snip

You can probalby lower that voltage. I have an annoyingly big V drop on my board of 0.1 so ive got 3.5ghz at 1.45 annd its doing fine at 1.35 real voltage
Click to expand...

I will give memtest a go and see how it goes.

as for the Vcore I don't think I can lower it more than one notch as i know it was unstable at that level, failed prime after about 3hr's.

I don't think i have the best clocking chip in the world, but then again, the CPU block wasn't very flat (i should have really lapped it but i was too existed about my new build), and there is always the CPU to lapp 2.

I might give an 8multi a try to see if i can push it a little further, to be honest I have found it a bit easy to get this clock, i think i have only had 4 BSOD due to overclocking and I haven't had to restart CMOS once.
 
overclocking really is easy. It infuriates me soooo much when people dont overclock their pcs. I want to get a hammer and smash it up infront of them instead!

You better keep that overclock boy!
 
8igdave said:
overclocking really is easy. It infuriates me soooo much when people dont overclock their pcs. I want to get a hammer and smash it up infront of them instead!
Click to expand...

It's not for everyone. It's easy when you know how and not fair to assume everyone knows how to do it.
I deal with lots of people daily in need of advice on how to overclock, as well as lots of people who state clearly they are not interested in overclocking their PCs at all.
 
Last edited:
dr. sarf said:
It's not for everyone. It's easy when you know how and not fair to assume everyone knows how to do it.
I deal with lots of people daily in need of advice on how to overclock, as well as lots of people who state clearly they are not interested in overclocking their PCs at all.
Click to expand...

Arg ignorance. How to deal with it.
 
8igdave said:
You sdhould download the non free everest software. You can get it to show voltages, temperatures of even ** hard drives etc and they can appear in a vista tool bar or down at the bottem in nice pretty colours of yours choise. Also shows other things about your pc.

http://www.lavalys.com/products/overview.php?pid=3&ps=UE&lang=en
Click to expand...

but then i would have to pay... lol

i downloaded the trial on my laptop to see what was in it but haven't put it to use in anger yet. is the trail version the same, or does it have these nice pretty stuff removed. £18 hardly a lot.
 
Why use the 9x multiplier? Personally I would save it for higher overclocks. Have you tried 8x? I run my Q6600 at 8x multi with a higher FSB of 1752mhz which gets me more ladies.
 
Mine seems to be a lot more stable running at the 8x multiplier instead of 9. Only did a shortish test (about 20mins) runnin 8x400 at stock voltage and all cores were fine.

Last week when i was trying it i had it running at 9x380 (slightly higher i know) with 1.412 vcore and core 2 would fail after about 10mins.

I think this has taught me to experiment a bit more and take a lot more time over it than rush in and fail.
 
will try the 8 multi trik this weekend see if i can get any further than i did with 9.

is it a good idea to use a 8X425 to test if it will still run at higher FSB, or should i just jump in at 3.5GHz??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom