I was considering the Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 myself. Although I just read this review for it and they weren't that impressed with it. http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/motherboards/2011/09/09/asrock-z68-extreme4-gen3-review/1
I was considering the Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 myself. Although I just read this review for it and they weren't that impressed with it. http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/motherboards/2011/09/09/asrock-z68-extreme4-gen3-review/1
Well if that is the case how come you are wrong?
http://www.h-online.com/security/ne...ude-secure-boot-using-UEFI-2-3-1-1335246.html
UEFI 2.3.1 will allow secure boot for enterprise and business, which by the way nobody supports yet as intel hasnt developed this version yet and will only come once there panther point chipsets become available in 2010.
I suggest you check with HQ again before you start throwing mud at other brands as it looks very unprofessional.
I agree the Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 does seem slower and takes longer to fire up and longer to shut down so i would consider this board Asus P8Z68-V PRO gets good reviews and it will be the faster of the 2 boards.
I had the Asus P8Z68-V only sent back because of 2 faulty boards but it felt much quicker when using it.
we're nearing the end of 2011
I was considering the Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 myself. Although I just read this review for it and they weren't that impressed with it. http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/motherboards/2011/09/09/asrock-z68-extreme4-gen3-review/1
We tested the SATA and performance with an OCZ Vertex 3 240GB, as this is the fastest SSD we've ever tested, and it can test the maximum speed of SATA 3Gbps and SATA 6Gbps ports.
We use ATTO Disk Benchmark, and take the read and write speeds for 1,024KB data chunks.
ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 (Intel P67 SATA 6Gbps) 325MB/s Read 362MB/s Write
I agree the Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 does seem slower and takes longer to fire up and longer to shut down so i would consider this board Asus P8Z68-V PRO gets good reviews and it will be the faster of the 2 boards.
I had the Asus P8Z68-V only sent back because of 2 faulty boards but it felt much quicker when using it.
Bit confused about the great review at vortex and the relatively average review for the extreme4 gen3 elsewhere. Who is right?
Putting it into perspective of course it is probably negligible differences
Well if that is the case how come you are wrong?
http://www.h-online.com/security/ne...ude-secure-boot-using-UEFI-2-3-1-1335246.html
UEFI 2.3.1 will allow secure boot for enterprise and business, which by the way nobody supports yet as intel hasnt developed this version yet and will only come once there panther point chipsets become available in 2012.
I suggest you check with HQ again before you start throwing mud at other brands as it looks very unprofessional.
When it is released in 2012, Windows 8 – though possibly only versions aimed at professional and enterprise use – will be able to use the UEFI secure boot function
“Topics in this session include: wow a future platform would evolve with advanced features in
firmware using the latest UEFI protocol and services; [and] technical details of the latest Windows* 8 platform requirements including UEFI boot and security will be discussed.”
Its Vortez not Vortex btw The Extreme4 Gen3 is a solid board as I outlined in my review, I have no idea how Bit-tech came to the results they did, I have heard that their articles as of late have been somewhat wanting based on their own reader comments on their reviews.
There are quite a few on OcUK that have this mobo after my recommendation and if you ask them - they will vouch for it being a brilliant buy!