Caporegime
- Joined
- 13 May 2003
- Posts
- 34,797
- Location
- Warwickshire
I couldn't see a thread on this, which surprised me so assuming I haven't missed one...
I think this practice is very well known by everyone at this point, but just in case not, it's basically having multiple full-time jobs at the same time, where each employer may or may not know that you're also employed by someone else.
It's controversial in that although it's not illegal per se / a criminal offence (with some exceptions I'm sure), you are often breaching one or more contracts of employment, and arguably not dedicating 100% of your working effort to a single employee as they'd expect. But then others argue that if you're able to work two or more jobs at once, then why prevent people earning more money (and paying more tax)?
I can absolutely see the appeal. It really has to be remote to work long term, which almost limits the scope to IT jobs, although it's actually possible if only one job is remote.
Imagine cruising on 2 x £100k jobs that you can do with your eyes closed and taking home £10k every month.
I think this practice is very well known by everyone at this point, but just in case not, it's basically having multiple full-time jobs at the same time, where each employer may or may not know that you're also employed by someone else.
It's controversial in that although it's not illegal per se / a criminal offence (with some exceptions I'm sure), you are often breaching one or more contracts of employment, and arguably not dedicating 100% of your working effort to a single employee as they'd expect. But then others argue that if you're able to work two or more jobs at once, then why prevent people earning more money (and paying more tax)?
I can absolutely see the appeal. It really has to be remote to work long term, which almost limits the scope to IT jobs, although it's actually possible if only one job is remote.
Imagine cruising on 2 x £100k jobs that you can do with your eyes closed and taking home £10k every month.
