• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

P4 950 vs E6300

Associate
Joined
6 Apr 2004
Posts
1,829
Location
Bath, UK
My mate is wondering if he should upgrade to a conroe but the benchmarks are showing that the 950 is coming out on top, is it worth it or should he go for a E6600?
 
Motherboard with likley be a DS3/4 and ram with be pc6400 2gig. He isnt to keen on OC but he knows it is easy, just lazy. He uses it for like bf2142 maxed out as he has 2 x 7900GTOC's
 
Last edited:
E6300. Not that much better than the 950 at stock, but not overclocking it is pretty criminal when 50% overclocks seem to be standard!
 
BillytheImpaler said:
Indeed. They clock up to 2.4-2.7 GHz without batting an eye.
Man if I don't get 2.8GHz rock solid I'm gonna FREAK!!!!!!!!!!!

3.5GHz and the bubbly is coming out! :cool: (That means 500MHz-external clock on the ASUS P5B-Deluxe and DDR1000 speeds from the Crucial 10th Anniversary DDR667 as well!)
 
Not to even mention the lower power consumption of the 6300 & the fact that it will be easier to transfer to a new mobo when the next unnecessary forced interface upgrade arrives (PCI-E 2, DDR3etc).
 
Quixote said:
Not to even mention the lower power consumption of the 6300 & the fact that it will be easier to transfer to a new mobo when the next unnecessary forced interface upgrade arrives (PCI-E 2, DDR3etc).

The 950 is more generally compatible with S775 boards than the E6300 so I cannot see how the unnecessary forced upgrade comment applies?
 
What I mean is that future motherboards will probably be more likely to support the e6300 & often they are the only ones to support new standards. Like people on the old pentium sockets can't really get pci-e which (almost) locks them out of new graphics cards (at reasonable prices) but they may have 2.8/3ghz pentiums.
I was being a bit tongue in cheek about forced upgrades but it's nice when a standard hangs around for a bit so you can upgrade incrementaly.
 
I bought the E6300 because i thought it OC good but i have had problems (still am) I Cannot over clock it AT ALL with out any programes randomly not responding, i bought a new psu etc but i think i may need new cooling even tho i have seen some people hit 3ghz on stock cooling :( Do i have a bad chiP?
 
jongeeone said:
I bought the E6300 because i thought it OC good but i have had problems (still am) I Cannot over clock it AT ALL with out any programes randomly not responding, i bought a new psu etc but i think i may need new cooling even tho i have seen some people hit 3ghz on stock cooling :( Do i have a bad chiP?

Did you never get any further with your other thread?
 
Got a Pentium D 830 "3GHZ", overclocked to "3.45GHZ" and all stable, can overclock more but it pulls way to much power and puts a lot of strain on the PSU, this is where a core2duo would come in use, apparently easy to overclock and uses half the power of my curent CPU, currently pulling 150W!!!!, but if I get one would be at least an E6600 as it has twice as much cache, E6600 traples over the Pentium D 950 easily on all tests, but it would go head to head with the Pentium D 965 on some tests but once overclocked would beat it...

SO core2duo would be faster, uses less power, so less heat and quiter running systme, but weahter you want to spend £230 on one is your choice... It will certainly give you more frames per second if your gaming at high resoluitons
 
I'm sorry - but having thought this through I reckon this thread is a bit pointless. Unless you are somehow locked into a non Core2Duo motherboard then the Core2Duo is clearly the better choice. Either at stock (small difference in the real world, big difference in benchmarks) or overclocked (huge difference generally).
 
Back
Top Bottom