Pairs Hiltion. Now a singer?

ElRazur said:
Any excuse to post her pics ayeee? ;)

Look i just dont fancy her bum and based on the standard of the pictures i posted, I just wont give it to her.
No my GF aint a model but she's has a better arse and dont need make up to look good. :)

But the make-up is on her face, we're talking about her body. I agree she looks ugly, without make up. But her body, is very very nice.

It's better than Janet Jacksons, by far.
 
iCraig said:
But the make-up is on her face, we're talking about her body. I agree she looks ugly, without make up. But her body, is very very nice.

It's better than Janet Jacksons, by far.

No i still wont give it to her, ive seen better bodies on the bus home during rush hour.

I guess we gonna have to disagree to agree. Beauty is very subjective and from where im standing, her body is rubbish.
 
penski said:
What of her siblings who are not famous? In particular, her two brothers...

*n

They have willys.

She has boobs, She just needs to flash them around and that will get people talking.
Her brothers are more then likely more modest then her and more business sided with the hotels.

Paris Hilton has Ruined the Hilton name IMO. Her Grand father would be turning in his grave if hes dead.

She has people behind the scenes doing a lot for her career and "businesses" she has the money to get people to do it for her.
 
Zip said:
They have willys.

She has boobs, She just needs to flash them around and that will get people talking.
Her brothers are more then likely more modest then her and more business sided with the hotels.

Paris Hilton has Ruined the Hilton name IMO. Her Grand father would be turning in his grave if hes dead.

She has people behind the scenes doing a lot for her career and "businesses" she has the money to get people to do it for her.
She still has to want to do it. Her brothers could easily become as famous if they wanted to be famous, it's nothing to with their sex.

As for ruining the Hilton name? Well I'm sure that they're gutted you will never use their hotels again, somehow I think that her grandfather (who is very much alive) won't be doing any grave spinning just yet.

Everyone seems to have a very strong opinion about this girl, without being in possesion of many facts.
 
penski said:
She's been singing for a while...

As for her current single - it's an average, middle-of-the-road pop song. Nothing to get excited over and certainly nothing to have a coronary about either.

And as for anyone ranting about 'the state of music these days' oh please.

*n
once again penski posts exactely what i was going to, except he writes cleverer
 
penski said:
As it stands, you detest her because of her name or because of a preconceived notion which you hold.

In either case, you're an idiot.

*n

And calling me an idiot because you disagree is the mature thing to do :rolleyes:

I suppose you have met her in real life and also know for fact how clever and brilliant she is.

She's a model, she writes, acts (film and TV), sings, produces perfumes...

She has a chain of clubs, a game coming out soon...

In terms of business, she is at the opposite end to how the likes of Brandson and Gates have excelled. She was automatically famous thanks to the whole sex tape scene. Being a model is not about intelligence, it's about how photogenic/good looking you are. Her most succesful book was "co-written" by Merle Ginsberg. Hmm. She has the acting skills of a cardboard box (as already established) and of course - the singing - can we not go there please. David Beckham has a bloody perfume, BECAUSE he is a celebrity. When you're a celebrity, you can do ANYTHING, and idiots will buy it because that is the psychology behind our "celebrity-worshiping" culture.

My point is, I've read LOTS on this woman and she gets OTHER PEOPLE to do things for her. That's what it boils down to, and pretty much everyone I've talked to agrees that she comes accross as being a complete cretin. She is common muck and anyone educated shouldn't give a flying toss about her.
 
Last edited:
da_mic_1530 said:
once again penski posts exactely what i was going to, except he writes cleverer
lol quoted for truth, i would have posted a rage of capitals and exclamation marks, and i would have typed it angrily, like this;
NO HAEV U TESTED HER THO????!!!!! FINK NOT>
 
iCraig said:
But the make-up is on her face, we're talking about her body. I agree she looks ugly, without make up. But her body, is very very nice.

It's better than Janet Jacksons, by far.
Maybe he likes fat chicks?
 
Gilly said:
Maybe he likes fat chicks?

Paris Hilton is grossly underweight.

Her body is gross.

I have to agree with ElRazur with Paris not doing anything for us
 
Cross posting the formula:

Otacon said:
Not munted female + pulse + less than my height and weight = I'd hit it
Janet is probably heavier than me. And is arguably munted.

Paris aint. Therefore...... (carry the one).... I'd hit it.
 
Back
Top Bottom