James07 said:
LOL
Ask me about electrical gear, and I can't stand cheap brands. I just won't have a no-brand piece of hi-fi gear. I hate them.
In my bedroom I have kit from Yamaha, Pioneer, B&W, NAD... the list goes on (not wanting to sound like I'm bragging here

), but when it comes to my car, why pay £10,000 on a car, when you can have something equally as good for a fraction of the cost, and that people think is gash yet you know completely different. It's all part of the fun.
I'm on my 3rd Rover. I've owned this one since March and so far, have spent several hundred pounds modifying it. It's a bit rusty and leaks a bit of oil but it flew straight through its recent MOT after having a new CV joint, but that's all I've had to spend on it since I bought it.
Similar thing with my other two... apart from having to replace a gearbox that I blew up on my last car, they've never needed anything other than service items... and I drive my cars hard.
My Dad owns a Rover 820, P reg. It's done 276,000 miles on its original engine and headgasket. He's owned several Rovers and none of them have ever let them down.
Tbh, I don't give a toss what anyone here thinks or says about my car. It's me who has to drive it and I'm the one who has to put up with the stigma of owning it. So bloody what

I've shown up a handful of 'much better' cars and have had great fun doing so.
Sure, people think I'm some sort of loser for praising cars from a manufacturer who've had their fair share of problems. I just think it's sad that people jump on the same "OMGHGF" bandwagon just because a certain engine design had its problems.
You can't tell me Rover are the only manufacturer to EVER release a car with problems?
As far as I'm concerned, I'll carry on driving whatever car I want. Whether that's a £300 Rover or a £30,000 Subaru Impreza (hey, I can dream

) then so be it. I'll drive my car with pride.