Not really, you should check out the recent article at Firing Squad. They did a full analysis of HDR+AA on X1800 and X1900 graphics cards and confirmed that it's more than playable.Richdog said:As for AA + HDR... when you play at the resolutions I do (20.1" widescreen) nothing less than an X1900 XTX would make it remotely playable. An X1800XT would certainly wither and die.

If I am not mistaken, a 20.1" widescreen LCD has a native resolution of 1680x1050 (or 1764k pixels.) When I was still using my 19" CRT I could play Oblivion just fine in 1600x1200 (or 1920k pixels) with 4xFSAA (or 2xFSAAA) as long as I turned shadows off.
For me performance goes in this order...
Hehe, that's quite a scale. I never knew the X1800XT was the best graphics card on the market.Richdog said:OC'd 256MB X1800XT > OC'd 512MB X1800XT > OC'd 7900GT > OC'd 7900GTX > OC'd X1900XTX

As for the actual order, from what I have seen of benchmarks on Anandtech, Firing Squad, Tom's Hardware, Guru3D, X-Bit Labs, etc. it goes like this: -
- 7950GX2 (x2)
- X1900XT (x2)
- 7950GX2
- 7900GT (x2)
- X1900XT-X (oc)
- X1900XT (oc)
- 7900GTX (oc)
- X1900XT-X
- X1900XT
- 7900GTX
- 7900GT (pmod)
- X1800XT (oc)
- 7900GT (oc)
- 7800GTX (512)
- X1800XT
- 7900GT
- 7800GTX (256)
Mmmmm, 7950GX2.Richdog said:The X1800's are good, solid cards, but I would honestly rather have a 7900GT and OC the hell out of it. Performance would be equal or greater in the majority of games, and the thing would be a lot cooler. Saying that, I wouldn't trade my XTX for anything on the market right now besides a GX2.![]()

Last edited: