I'll keep this as brief as I can and won't go in to specifics, but basically my boss pulled me up on some work that I signed off that basically wasn't good enough - I wasn't picking up on the details - that was the issue.
He also highlighted that I wasn't showing the enthusiasm or 'energy' that he was expecting.
Few months later, I received an email from him inviting me to a meeting to discuss my performance and how it wasn't good enough (not picking up details, no enthusiasm, not giving him updates on projects)
The meeting was minuted and I received a copy and was given a month to improve my performance.
In that time I made more effort to talk to him more about what work I was doing, I picked up more 'details' with other peoples work.
Fast forward to yesterday and I get a pdf letter saying my preparation for meetings was poor, my professional qualification submission was rushed and I relied on other people reviewing it too much.
I hold my hands up that a couple of things raised (not in the most recent letter) were valid but one thing that really gets me is that the original issues raised are different to those in the letter yesterday.
my organisation isn't as good as it could be but my communication internally and externally has improved and I've worked hard on the other areas.
So I have another meeting on Monday (4:30). I'll fight my corner as some of it I feel is completely unjustified, but I have a few questions:
What I really want to do is hand my notice in on Monday morning and work out my notice. What I'm concerned about is any reference that may be given would be negative.
I would also need to be able to explain why I quit. My answer would be that I've had no structured training or support in my time there (which is true) but is that a good idea? If not, what is the alternative.
Advice is would be very welcome.
Many thanks
He also highlighted that I wasn't showing the enthusiasm or 'energy' that he was expecting.
Few months later, I received an email from him inviting me to a meeting to discuss my performance and how it wasn't good enough (not picking up details, no enthusiasm, not giving him updates on projects)
The meeting was minuted and I received a copy and was given a month to improve my performance.
In that time I made more effort to talk to him more about what work I was doing, I picked up more 'details' with other peoples work.
Fast forward to yesterday and I get a pdf letter saying my preparation for meetings was poor, my professional qualification submission was rushed and I relied on other people reviewing it too much.
I hold my hands up that a couple of things raised (not in the most recent letter) were valid but one thing that really gets me is that the original issues raised are different to those in the letter yesterday.
my organisation isn't as good as it could be but my communication internally and externally has improved and I've worked hard on the other areas.
So I have another meeting on Monday (4:30). I'll fight my corner as some of it I feel is completely unjustified, but I have a few questions:
What I really want to do is hand my notice in on Monday morning and work out my notice. What I'm concerned about is any reference that may be given would be negative.
I would also need to be able to explain why I quit. My answer would be that I've had no structured training or support in my time there (which is true) but is that a good idea? If not, what is the alternative.
Advice is would be very welcome.
Many thanks