Do you need to have read the original to properly follow on to Schrodinger's Kittens or is it complete in it's own right?
It's been a while since I read it, but I seem to remember that while it made a few references to the earlier book and events therein, there was no
need to have read it.
Having said that, they both get into some pretty heavy stuff - albeit in a very readable way; no equationfests that I can recall - but reading
...Schrodinger's Cat first will obviously help. I suppose it all depends upon how familiar you are with the, erm, basics
Incidentally, Simon Singh's
Big Bang! is an entertaining and educational read, too, with its astrophysicsy slant.
E=mc^2 by David Bodanis might be worth a punt too, though it leans more toward 'popular' than 'science'. Still, entertaining writing.
In fact, I've just realised that all the books I've mentioned I no longer have, due to them being lent to colleagues and never seen again. Bah.
