• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

PhysX FluidMark 1.5.2

Gregster

Gregster

Gregster

Caporegime
Joined
24 Sep 2008
Posts
38,284
Location
Essex innit!
Just for fun, thought I would run this bench.

For AMD users to join into this thread, you will need to list what CPU you have and what clock speeds please. I will still add the scores and each processor can have a battle.

Please provide a screenshot of your score and list your GPU/CPU and what speed both were doing. No screenie = no score added. Remember it is just a bit of fun and not to be taken too serious (photoshopped results will end with the user being hunted down and the vices/jump leads/concrete overcoats will be used) :D

Download from here and let me know what you think guys and gals.

http://www.geeks3d.com/20130308/flu...nchmark-fluid-sph-simulation-opengl-download/

Top 10 Nvidia GPU's

1. 8607 - Kaapstad - Titan Quad SLI
2. 8091 - Nuwidol - Titan SLI
3. 5559 - PCZ - 680 SLI
4. 5388 - Kaapstad - 690 Quad SLI
5. 5290 - Khemist - Titan
6. 4191 - OwaF - 680
7. 4066 - Gregster - Titan
8. 4006 - JeffyB - 680
9. 3300 - Illuz - 670
9. 2570 - Defconluke - 660
9. 1652 - Bru - 470
9. 1634 - Ceuotc - 680M

Top 10 AMD GPU's

1. 1946 - {SAS}TB - 3930K @ 4.8 - TRI 7970
2. 1660 - Ceuotc - 3770K @ 3.5Ghz - 7970
3. 795 - MadMatty - Q6600 @ 3.6 - 7850
4. 69 - UltraDad - AMD FX 4100 @ 4.0 - 6870

Top 10 Hybrid

1. 3223 - Confused Stu - 7970 + 460 - 2600K @ 4.5
 
Last edited:
b5h4jp.png


I don't quite think this takes multi-gpu set ups as PhysX is only run on one GFX core, but never-the-less my 670 does quite well against a Titan I think!
 
Hmmm l think this answers your question lol.



May have to jury rig my GTX 560Ti in here and try some hybrid action :D
 


There you go just for reference my 470@800Mhz the i7 920 is at 4GHz as well but i assume it either doesn't use it or it is misreading it.
 
GTX 660 @ stock. Shows as 980/1033mhz core in GPUZ but dynamic boost took it to 1084mhz in the benchmark.

8671856392_3efea06afa_z.jpg


GTX 660 Overclocked. Shows as 1092/1145mhz core in GPUZ but dynamic boost took it to 1188mhz in the benchmark. Memory speed increased too.

8671856428_8446b1ded8_z.jpg



With the way the card boosts itself, I never know what to put for the clocks in these benchmark threads.
 
khemist said:
I really do not know how you cba updating all these Gregster, but thanks all the same. :)
Click to expand...

Just a bit of fun and I will be separating the cards for each card (Titan/7970/680/670 etc) and will be having the top 10 for each card. I will wait till we have a good few results in and then change it to each card that enters. It doesn't matter what GPU you have (AMD or Nvidia), get pushing the cards hard and post your results :)

If anyone else has any ideas for this thread, I am open to suggestions good or bad.
 
Hi greg, just a suggestion - Change the AMD cards to represent their CPU & clock as well as the card, as it doesn't use the GPU for PhysX if you have AMD, it uses the CPU. :)
 
illuz said:
Hi greg, just a suggestion - Change the AMD cards to represent their CPU & clock as well as the card, as it doesn't use the GPU for PhysX if you have AMD, it uses the CPU. :)
Click to expand...

Great thinking. I will add the AMD cards by processors and clock speeds.

@ Ceutoc, I have you listed as a 3770K at 3.5Ghz, is this correct?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom