• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

PhysX

^^says resident NVFANBOT, face facts, *****x is fail and only the sados believe otherwise. Support for future titles is all but non existent. I guess the idea of going out and buying another GFX card to do some cheap effects never caught on, that and the fact it and the games suck.

As always you get the odd mug that goes out and invests in nvidias milking exercise.
 
Last edited:
after what i read on this forum, i say must some of the people have really bad attitude towards the losing (atm) company that needed to be addressed. what if that company return to form? wouldnt it be great for everyone? i honestly dont care who makes the gfx as long as it has good (quiet) performance at a reasonable price.

on this topic, i dont think its worth have a extra gfx just for physX because it is not worth the extra heat and it would a waste of a pci express slot. i think it would be all better if you use that slot for sli. 30% improvement on min fps is a lot, but its a shame not many use physX

on a side note, i really hope nvidia can return to what they were in 2006 with great cards like 8800gtx with fermi. so the prices of gfx can drop to an affordable price.
 
Last edited:
Hardware physics is capable of enhancing a game enough to justify spending the £30-40 or so on an extra GPU and the heat and power... the problem is no game so far has used physics to that degree - a large part of that due to how much of the market doing so would cut off... no publisher is prepared to put that much on the line to make the leap to the next level.
 
Rroff said:
Hardware physics is capable of enhancing a game enough to justify spending the £30-40 or so on an extra GPU and the heat and power... the problem is no game so far has used physics to that degree - a large part of that due to how much of the market doing so would cut off... no publisher is prepared to put that much on the line to make the leap to the next level.
Click to expand...

thats exactly what i tried to say, its a shame not many developers willing to use hardware accelerated physic like batman does.
 
Thread hijack alert!!!

I got a msi AM3 motherboard that has a amd chipset and supports crossfire.

My graphics card is a nvidia gtx260.

Can I add another nvidia graphics card to do physx? Or have nvidia done some anti-amd blocking the use of multiple nvidia card on amd motherboard trick?
 
how dare you steal my thread in my search for a good physx card, shame on you!

and i believe you can add another card to handle physx but im not sure
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom