How disturbing why on earth didn't anyone intervene or just walk off with the dog!
Sort of the point of it.
How disturbing why on earth didn't anyone intervene or just walk off with the dog!
Ah yes, good way to pass it off. Or not. I think peoples moral objection isn't that there are starving animals in the World, there are, that much is patently obvious and tragic. What the objection is about is the fact that this artist (and I'm using the term loosely) has profited from leaving a dog tied up to starve to death and that none of the visitors to the exhibit even seem to have questioned this.
How disturbing why on earth didn't anyone intervene or just walk off with the dog!
Why didn't anyone do that when it was out on the streets?
this guy took away all chances it had of survival.
Juanita Bermúdez, director of the Códice Gallery, insisted Natividad escaped after just one day. She said: 'It was untied all the time except for the three hours the exhibition lasted and it was fed regularly with dog food Habacuc himself brought in.'
What is worse, the artist for doing it or the apathy of the visitors?
I'd put them on a par.
If he's allowed to do this again I would actually pay for my air fare over to said exhibition and come hell and high water I'd get that poor dog out of there.
I can't describe how angry that has made me feel, I'm literally seething with rage at that 'artist' and the organisers of the event who allowed it, as well as the idiots that view such atrocities.
If you think I'm a keyboard warrior when I say this, fine, but if I ever saw the artists responsible for this, I wouldn't hesitate to give him a damn good kicking. It'd be worth the time custody just to make him feel a tiny percentage of the pain that poor dog went through.
It's not as if there aren't enough starving people and animals in this world that we're trying to save. For him to do this is completely and utterly barbaric, ******* *****.
Do people read the whole thread these days? Apparently the dog wasn't allowed to die. It was fed regularly -- however the people visiting the gallery didn't know that, the only thing they had to go on was what the display plaque stated...that this dog was going to starve to death. Yet still they did nothing.
If he's allowed to do this again I would actually pay for my air fare over to said exhibition and come hell and high water I'd get that poor dog out of there.
I can't describe how angry that has made me feel, I'm literally seething with rage at that 'artist' and the organisers of the event who allowed it, as well as the idiots that view such atrocities.
If you think I'm a keyboard warrior when I say this, fine, but if I ever saw the artists responsible for this, I wouldn't hesitate to give him a damn good kicking. It'd be worth the time custody just to make him feel a tiny percentage of the pain that poor dog went through.
It's not as if there aren't enough starving people and animals in this world that we're trying to save. For him to do this is completely and utterly barbaric, ******* *****.
Signed
Disgraceful, I know what I'd do to him If I got my hands on him.![]()
For gods sake, did you read the thread? The dog survived. it was faked to make a point.
No point in trying, the poster who posted directly after you didn't even realise!