Raising prices and asking for a hand out because dividends have been paid out is the same as to pay out, in the end.Which isn't what he said but sure.
Raising prices and asking for a hand out because dividends have been paid out is the same as to pay out, in the end.Which isn't what he said but sure.
It'll be an absolute outrage if the taxpayer foots the bill to avoid investors losing out in the event TW goes under. A private company that deliberately loaded up on debt to increase dividends whilst simultaneously running an essential service into the ground and poisoning our waterways? Madness.
It should be considered treason to purposefully endanger the supply of critical infrastructure.
Is it because of dividends? Despite what you think investors don't like losing money so running a business into the ground doesn't usually make much sense. Clearly more has happened here.Raising prices and asking for a hand out because dividends have been paid out is the same as to pay out, in the end.
Is it because of dividends? Despite what you think investors don't like losing money so running a business into the ground doesn't usually make much sense. Clearly more has happened here.
Except they generally haven't lost money have they?Is it because of dividends? Despite what you think investors don't like losing money so running a business into the ground doesn't usually make much sense. Clearly more has happened here.
It is, the combined debt of the privatised water companies is almost exactly the same as the combine dicidends paid since privatisation, no water company paying a dividend should be allowed to significantly increase bills doubly so if they are failing in their basic duties.That isn't happening though.
Thing is just shouting dividends shields the real culprits, the governments that have allowed this. Painting the investors as the bad guys is just such an easy deflection for those in power that nothing will change because of it.Except they generally haven't lost money have they?
Banks bailed out constantly, even car manufacturers have been saved from the fate they deserve and so naturally the vultures think they're invincible.
Yes, weak governments, weak regulators, weak licensing agreements are the primary fault.Thing is just shouting dividends shields the real culprits, the governments that have allowed this. Painting the investors as the bad guys is just such an easy deflection for those in power that nothing will change because of it.
Wow; that article is hilarious. On one hand it seems preposterous SWW can make such claims but then on the other what's the bet some legalese nonsense proscribed in EA owned or water-way licensing agreements does indeed absolve water companies of the responsibility for clean water-ways and outlets to sea!Public has no right to swim in sea, claims firm that dumped sewage at bathing spot
As South West Water defends a court action from a Devon swimmer, it also claims it has no legal duty to keep waters cleaninews.co.uk
They are taking the
Almost exactly what capitalism is designed to do tbh. They've maximised returns for shareholders. Job done - don't blame a dog when it barks!Yes, weak governments, weak regulators, weak licensing agreements are the primary fault.
BUT it's a close secondary that monopoly based privates companies (and seemingly share-holders) with a captive customer-base have operated a strategy which has ripped TW to shreds. There was a happy median here which allowed for both investment and conservative profits but nah let's milk it dead. It's pretty weird.
A somewhat subverted idea of capitalism if maximising profits at the expense of collapsing said company, when considering its monopoly is effectively a perpetuity of customers / profits. Then again, capitalism and monopolisation should not co-exist.Almost exactly what capitalism is designed to do tbh. They've maximised returns for shareholders. Job done - don't blame a dog when it barks!
Thing is just shouting dividends shields the real culprits, the governments that have allowed this. Painting the investors as the bad guys is just such an easy deflection for those in power that nothing will change because of it.
Define collapsing though - taps are still allowing water to flow through.A somewhat subverted idea of capitalism if maximising profits at the expense of collapsing said company, when considering its monopoly is effectively a perpetuity of customers / profits. Then again, capitalism and monopolisation should not co-exist.
Public has no right to swim in sea, claims firm that dumped sewage at bathing spot
As South West Water defends a court action from a Devon swimmer, it also claims it has no legal duty to keep waters cleaninews.co.uk
They are taking the
Its on my list of optionsSounds like you should consider voting green. They want to nationalise utilities and clean up the seas and rivers.
In spirit? There's enough articles detailing the loans, debt and other malfeasance.Define collapsing though - taps are still allowing water to flow through.