plan for collapse of Thames Water

It'll be an absolute outrage if the taxpayer foots the bill to avoid investors losing out in the event TW goes under. A private company that deliberately loaded up on debt to increase dividends whilst simultaneously running an essential service into the ground and poisoning our waterways? Madness.

Yup, but those in power etc don't care.

Make a profit? Keep it private.

Rack up a debt? Keep it public.

Nothing will change, they are all on the gravy train.
 
Last edited:
Raising prices and asking for a hand out because dividends have been paid out is the same as to pay out, in the end.
Is it because of dividends? Despite what you think investors don't like losing money so running a business into the ground doesn't usually make much sense. Clearly more has happened here.
 
Is it because of dividends? Despite what you think investors don't like losing money so running a business into the ground doesn't usually make much sense. Clearly more has happened here.

The principle investors clearly haven't lost any money, It's just been a vulture capitalist merry-go-round of bleeding the asset dry. The musics stopped and there is nothing left.
 
Is it because of dividends? Despite what you think investors don't like losing money so running a business into the ground doesn't usually make much sense. Clearly more has happened here.
Except they generally haven't lost money have they?

Banks bailed out constantly, even car manufacturers have been saved from the fate they deserve and so naturally the vultures think they're invincible.
 
Except they generally haven't lost money have they?

Banks bailed out constantly, even car manufacturers have been saved from the fate they deserve and so naturally the vultures think they're invincible.
Thing is just shouting dividends shields the real culprits, the governments that have allowed this. Painting the investors as the bad guys is just such an easy deflection for those in power that nothing will change because of it.
 
Thing is just shouting dividends shields the real culprits, the governments that have allowed this. Painting the investors as the bad guys is just such an easy deflection for those in power that nothing will change because of it.
Yes, weak governments, weak regulators, weak licensing agreements are the primary fault.

BUT it's a close secondary that monopoly based privates companies (and seemingly share-holders) with a captive customer-base have operated a strategy which has ripped TW to shreds. There was a happy median here which allowed for both investment and conservative profits but nah let's milk it dead. It's pretty weird.
 

They are taking the
Wow; that article is hilarious. On one hand it seems preposterous SWW can make such claims but then on the other what's the bet some legalese nonsense proscribed in EA owned or water-way licensing agreements does indeed absolve water companies of the responsibility for clean water-ways and outlets to sea!
 
Yes, weak governments, weak regulators, weak licensing agreements are the primary fault.

BUT it's a close secondary that monopoly based privates companies (and seemingly share-holders) with a captive customer-base have operated a strategy which has ripped TW to shreds. There was a happy median here which allowed for both investment and conservative profits but nah let's milk it dead. It's pretty weird.
Almost exactly what capitalism is designed to do tbh. They've maximised returns for shareholders. Job done - don't blame a dog when it barks!
 
Almost exactly what capitalism is designed to do tbh. They've maximised returns for shareholders. Job done - don't blame a dog when it barks!
A somewhat subverted idea of capitalism if maximising profits at the expense of collapsing said company, when considering its monopoly is effectively a perpetuity of customers / profits. Then again, capitalism and monopolisation should not co-exist.
 
Thing is just shouting dividends shields the real culprits, the governments that have allowed this. Painting the investors as the bad guys is just such an easy deflection for those in power that nothing will change because of it.

Why not both? Why are companies seen as a force of nature, free from the restraints of morality?

There’s multiple problems here - from the whole concept of privatising vital national infrastructure to yet another regulator with no real teeth to a company willing to destroy the infrastructure of a country to make a quick buck.
 
A somewhat subverted idea of capitalism if maximising profits at the expense of collapsing said company, when considering its monopoly is effectively a perpetuity of customers / profits. Then again, capitalism and monopolisation should not co-exist.
Define collapsing though - taps are still allowing water to flow through.
 
Back
Top Bottom