Plans for private messaging?

yes but the point is if they want to exchange links then they will, PMs would only make that one thing a bit easier but open up many other positive avenues...

I think OcUK have such a solid name that competitors links shouldn't make much difference anyway, they're a great company and people are perfectly aware that there are alternative places to buy but they still stick with OcUK...

In fact, if they allowed the discussion of competitor stuff openly if would cement them at the top of the pile :) - its the whole thing about not worrying about your competitors but make them worry about you ;)

Do you think an official Ferrari forum would give a crap if its members were discussing Renault Clios :p

I do see where you're coming from, but OcUK have always taken the stance of "why should we pay for a service so people can freely advertise other companies who could take business away from us". It's a stance I agree with personally. If I were running the forum, I doubt I'd allow competitor linking as well. If it were allowed, every time OcUK advertised a product, someone would come in and say "oh you can get it 2p cheaper from here", potentially ruining threads with off-topic arguments about said company. At least if it's kept off forum, people have to actively go hunting for any cheaper products, and that alone is often enough to stop some people going elsewhere.

As for PMs themselves, they are very useful at times, I use them extensively on other forums, but when it comes to PMs here, it's not about the positives, the decision to not allow them will be based on the negatives only. I would imagine that if OcUK could somehow block competitor linking (impossible I know) then I think they'd allow it. As they can't though, I expect them to stay blocked permanently.
 
i cant think of a single example of privacy that's needed on a public forum, and why the owner of a forum should provide it.


if you want a private talk, use msn.
 
PM's would be useful in regard to the members market. I would prefer to sell or buy something and keep my communications on this site as opposed to work email etc.
 
i cant think of a single example of privacy that's needed on a public forum, and why the owner of a forum should provide it.
I can see the reasons why OcUK don't allow them, and by the looks of it they are business reasons and thats cool... however PMs do have their place if they didn't the facility wouldn't be included in every off the shelf forum package out there...

Either way, I think PMs would be a welcome addition - but if its not gonna happen, then I'm not about to lose any sleep :p
 
Maybe the bosses just like to see everything thats said, it would make sense as to why they changed the trust email system to come from them rather than email -> email?

The trust message isn't stored, just emailed - it was done to keep your email address private from members you may not want to communicate with.
 
The trust message isn't stored, just emailed - it was done to keep your email address private from members you may not want to communicate with.

Any chance of the script changing though, so a trust message is emailed and you can reply to the senders email, rather than the black hole OCUK one?
 
It really doesn't need it - members have managed for 7/8 years so far so why now?
Thats a daft comment, the human race "managed" for god knows how many centuries without the internet, cars, mobile phones or modern healthcare but doesn't mean they're not very very welcome and well received.

Just because something is fine doesn't mean it couldn't be better, thats all I'm saying ;)
 
Thats a daft comment, the human race "managed" for god knows how many centuries without the internet, cars, mobile phones or modern healthcare but doesn't mean they're not very very welcome and well received.

Can....worms...let's not go there.
 
Back
Top Bottom