• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Please settle a dispute....

Associate
Joined
23 May 2005
Posts
60
Location
Wiltshire
Hi,

My friend and I have both bought brand new graphics cards. We were both on a budget, so couldn't spend much. (The wives.....) He went out and bought a Sapphire X1600 256Mb AGP and I bought a GeForce 7600 256Mb AGP.

Which of these cards is the best? His cost £60.00 and mine retails at £69.99.

I hope you can settle this once and for all!

Cheers,

Premier2k
 
Soldato
Joined
28 Oct 2005
Posts
9,147
Location
Scotland
Both sound like they are vanilla versions of the pro and GT respectively nad I would be extremely tempted to say the 7600 is the best of the two! I havent check benchmarks etc so hopefully someone can confirm this
 
Associate
OP
Joined
23 May 2005
Posts
60
Location
Wiltshire
Just been looking at that Toms Hardware. 7600 definatley out performs the X1600 anyday.

Can't wait to show him this website. Cheers guys. You've come to my rescue again!!!

LOL :D :D


Premier2k
 
Associate
Joined
2 Oct 2006
Posts
2,240
Ulfhedjinn said:
X1600 Series was crap, to put it bluntly. Your mate did not spend wisely.

agreed, my clueless friend decieded to go x1600xt XFIRE :rolleyes: It was the most pants performance of £200 I have ever seen in my life :eek: :D
 
Soldato
Joined
26 Apr 2004
Posts
9,355
Location
Milton Keynes
deadkomodo said:
agreed, my clueless friend decieded to go x1600xt XFIRE :rolleyes: It was the most pants performance of £200 I have ever seen in my life :eek: :D

Not necessarily. The x1600xt when it came out was actually a pretty decent card. The x1600xt/1650XT were the two cards in that range that were considered with some level of respect.

Xfire X1600XT for £200 aint actually too bad, especially if he bought it before the x1900s became a lot cheaper.
 
Associate
Joined
2 Oct 2006
Posts
2,240
Alexrose1uk said:
Not necessarily. The x1600xt when it came out was actually a pretty decent card. The x1600xt/1650XT were the two cards in that range that were considered with some level of respect.

Xfire X1600XT for £200 aint actually too bad, especially if he bought it before the x1900s became a lot cheaper.

Are having a laugh? :confused: When the x1600xt's were £100 the x1900xt was £200 ;)

In XFIRE he normally got about a 10% increase in frames over his single card in games (fresh install latest drivers ect). The single card was owned by the similary priced 7600gt and as previously stated for £200 at the time he could have got a x1900xt 512mb card :D (this is what I advised him to get but he wanted to use his 'sli beatin' xpress200 chipset to its full potential :rolleyes: ).

ALSO he sold his 6800gs to get that set up and in real games his frames were lower with the x1600xt XFIRE :p
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
26 Apr 2004
Posts
9,355
Location
Milton Keynes
Not really having a laugh, as the x1900 prices fluctuated a lot, and I seemed to remember the x1600 prices dropping before the x1900. In comparison to the x1900, its not great, but as a cheap way to try Xfire it could have been worse. If the x1900s were going cheap by then however its another story.

The other part of my comment still stands, the x1600xt/x1650xt were the only cards at that range considered decent.
 
Associate
Joined
2 Oct 2006
Posts
2,240
Alexrose1uk said:
The other part of my comment still stands, the x1600xt/x1650xt were the only cards at that range considered decent.

on the ati side of the fence...yes but on Nvidia side the 7600gt priced the same as the xt was faster than both those cards. Leaving 7900gs priced a tad more than x1650xt but was far superior.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom