PM's

Squark · 16 Feb 2013 at 04:34

I give this thread ****
That's four stars, not a sweary

Feek · 16 Feb 2013 at 10:13

ACEOWNER said:
These sigs cracks me up.

And technically, sigs like that are against the rules.

Images containing mostly very large words or animated .gifs will not be permitted.

ThundyCat · 16 Feb 2013 at 10:15

waynesalmon said:
.

Why did you feel the need to bump this thread?

@ Feek

Fixed!

Images containing mostly very large words, large guns and animated gifs, will not be permitted.

[FnG]magnolia · 16 Feb 2013 at 10:30

Feek said:
And technically, sigs like that are against the rules.

Very large words?

I'm going to assume you're joking to save us both your embarrassment.

Feek · 16 Feb 2013 at 10:40

[FnG]magnolia;23770721 said:
Very large words?

I'm going to assume you're joking to save us both your embarrassment.

No I'm not joking and there's no embarrassment here. See the rule I quoted, it's there and it's real. Just because it's not regularly enforced doesn't make it any less of a rule. There are many signatures that break that specific rule.

Feek · 16 Feb 2013 at 10:41

ThundyCat said:
@ Feek

Fixed!

Shaddup you

[FnG]magnolia · 16 Feb 2013 at 10:45

I didn't mean that the rule doesn't exist, I was questioning whether you were serious about a two word sig 'mostly containing very large words' when one of those was 'cow'.

Feek · 16 Feb 2013 at 10:49

I didn't really pay much attention to the actual words. It could have been HORSE for all I care and I still wouldn't have noticed the diffence

[FnG]magnolia · 16 Feb 2013 at 10:58

Well ... thanks for that :confused:

Hey OP, good luck getting banned!

Gilly · 16 Feb 2013 at 11:04