but the OP is asking for it to be iPhone friendly which is completely different.
Most of the people in this thread are talking about mobile sites (low-fi versions of standard web pages) but the OP is asking for it to be iPhone friendly which is completely different.
Most of the people in this thread are talking about mobile sites (low-fi versions of standard web pages) but the OP is asking for it to be iPhone friendly which is completely different.
Not really, the iPhone version of facebook for example is nasty, all pixelated and prrety much as bad as the full mobile version on phones with a decent resolution screen.
I find that even on a slow mobile device, if I switch off avatars, images and sigs in the User CP, I can browse just fine.
But it is iPhone friendly already...
I just had a check and it's usable but far from friendly, especially for an iPhone
As mentioned, it's perfectly fine for my touchscreen device.
I think the problem is the low resolution screen in the iPhone tbh.
i browse fine on my N96![]()
^ Excellent example of what an iPhone friendly (or any touchscreen device) site should be like.
But the whole point of smartphones is they access the internet like a computer. Making a second layer of the internet for phones is just a backwards step, much like going back to "mobile" sites that about 4 websites actually ever had.
The only sites that really have iPhone versions seem to be those owned by iPhone users anyway...
Not at all, a site should be designed specifically for the device it's going to be used on. You wouldn't design the same UI for a desktop application the same as a mobile application. So why shouldn't it be the same for websites?