• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
So the Nano is small... Great, I guess? But why would I need one / what does the size matter unless you are building a miniature ITX build? Render me unimpressed. $649 + tax for Fury X = 980Ti pricing.

Talk about stating the obvious.

It's literally purposely deigned for small form factors, somehow you have written that as a negative :D

Other people with bigger cases could go Fury X. They are literally catering for everyone.

:rolleyes:
 
Wow the hype has led to delusion!

From you I agree.

Read:

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18675135

in all I counted nigh on 16 driver has stopped responding crashes while using chrome (HW ACC OFF) and one driver crash while playing Witcher 3 causing it to corrupt all my recent saves. The previous driver 347.88 and 350.12 have been perfect.

I can concur that I also have been hampered with the Display Driver Has Stopped Responding quite a few times since I installed the latest Nvidia Drivers last week. :(

Previously my 980 GTX has worked flawlessly along with the MSI Afterburner.

Think I'll be sticking with 350.12 until NVIDIA gets it's act together

last 2 drivers bad for me gone back to 347.88 until this is sorted

Same problems here. Lots of driver crashes on the last two sets of drivers. A couple times my pc has completely locked up and I've had to hard reset.

Tried the lot of them, had more black screens@stock in 3 weeks than I had on oc'ed 290X CrossFire, not to mention game freezing, TDR's are constant-never had any on AMD over 18 months.:(

Can't get DSR options in NCP either, guessing that's down to having AMD drivers on this SSD-suppose I have to drop this SSD in a bucket of acid and put in a new one to get DSR.:D

I'm back on 350.12 too, said it before and I'll say it again, if I could get AMD driver stability with Nvidia game profiles, I'd be one happy gamer.
 
Last edited:
SLI is way ahead of Crossfire in terms of driver development.

No serious person would dispute this.

What? I don't use dual GPU's I already said that. You said Nvidia drivers were superior. I said Nvidia and AMD both have problems. There are no perfect drivers.

Read:

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18675135

in all I counted nigh on 16 driver has stopped responding crashes while using chrome (HW ACC OFF) and one driver crash while playing Witcher 3 causing it to corrupt all my recent saves. The previous driver 347.88 and 350.12 have been perfect.

I can concur that I also have been hampered with the Display Driver Has Stopped Responding quite a few times since I installed the latest Nvidia Drivers last week. :(

Previously my 980 GTX has worked flawlessly along with the MSI Afterburner.

Think I'll be sticking with 350.12 until NVIDIA gets it's act together

last 2 drivers bad for me gone back to 347.88 until this is sorted

Same problems here. Lots of driver crashes on the last two sets of drivers. A couple times my pc has completely locked up and I've had to hard reset.

Tried the lot of them, had more black screens@stock in 3 weeks than I had on oc'ed 290X CrossFire, not to mention game freezing, TDR's are constant-never had any on AMD over 18 months.:(

Can't get DSR options in NCP either, guessing that's down to having AMD drivers on this SSD-suppose I have to drop this SSD in a bucket of acid and put in a new one to get DSR.:D

I'm back on 350.12 too, said it before and I'll say it again, if I could get AMD driver stability with Nvidia game profiles, I'd be one happy gamer.
 
You said that in response to issues with dual AMD cards, heavily implying that Crossfire is on par with SLI. That's the part I was saying was deluded. :)



This isn't about you. I'll make it clear once again so there's no confusion: Nvidia have superior multi-GPU support to AMD.

Only the wildiest of fanboys would disagree.

No offence but I just don't care.

AMD did well, the new cards look well designed and if the performance is there I will get one. That's all I have to say.

Cheers :)
 
Well we got to see something new and pretty awesome looking. But due to lack of benchmarks and comparisons to 980tis and Titans, we are still kinda lacking in useful information :(

I am excited by these new cards though. The way they are built looks a helluva lot better than the GTX cards and I love that they said 50c and overclockability. Sounds good!

Agreed, need to see them in action get some reviews.

The cards look well designed, really liking the styling. AMD have done really well imho.
 
Because the Fury X could well perform say 5% slower than a 980Ti.

If the FuryX was faster than a TX then AMD would have said so, they have said the FuryX2 is the fastest card and yet mysteriously don't say fastest GPU.

^^

It's starting all over again. I think I will just come back to the thread after reviews go live lol.

AMD did a great job ! Looking forward to the benchmarks and reviews.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom