ebays feedback is horribly broken due to the fact there is no 'order' imposed on who leaves feedback first.
Which leads to the feedback ransom (tm) situations where you feel compelled to leave good feedback no matter what the service so you don't get any negative feedback yourself.
What they need to do is enforce a feedback order, seller first I would imagine, and not allow the buyer to post feedback for the seller until the seller has left feedback for the buyer. I'm not sure how after the fact edits would be handled, but it would at least be a start.
I buy lots of used cd's and soooo many times I don't get feedback from the seller until after I've left something for them.
What also doesn't help is people leaving things like 'Credit to ebay AAAAAA+' and all that nonsense as a positive. It would be far better if people would leave a bit of description in the positive (or negative) comments. Nothing fancy, I tend to leave things like :
'quick delivery and item in good condition, thanks!' (assuming of course the item was delivered quickly and was in good condition!)
Which at least tells people that it was a good trade and *why* I thought it was a good trade.
If people did that, even if someone was to leave forced positive feedback it would be clear by reading it that this was the case.
Doubt ebay really care though. Until some other online auction rises from nowhere and offers a more advanced trading environment to lure customers away. Anyone got a few months and some capital spare?
Kev