Consigliere
- Joined
- 12 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 151,034
- Location
- SW17
Wow it's close.
I notice the join date the most.
I notice the join date the most.
Personally not a fan of the disdain new members are treated with tbh, would like it hidden.
it need whether the "changes the way I perceive them" part is positive or negative though![]()
I think the Joined date is much more influential than Posts count though together they can give a very general picture.
Someone who joined in June 2010 with a post count of 5,000 needs to go get some fresh air and get laid.
Why is joined date important?
That's even more arbitrary than post count, why not judge on content rather than some date?
Keep it. Higher postcount usually denotes someone is to be trusted more (else they'd have already been banned) and have more experience in the subforums.
There are loads of people who are calling for the removal of post counts. I'm unconvinced this really makes a difference. I'm not asking if you want them removed, just whether they make a difference to you personally.
thats my take on things too![]()
I have noticed a user with 5k of posts in 6 months... with this in mind I can only take the assumption of potential spam. This is an unfair account as this person may be a very talented and helpful individual. On the same note, I only have sub 150posts, have been here a year, have spent little times on the forum until last week and have been made a moderator. How would one judge myself based on this?
Andy