Post Your 3DMark2K1/2K3 results here

[P-E]

3DMark2001 = 24109 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7898859

3DMark03 = 11245 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2638982

 

[Carter]

19249 all at stock

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7898820

 

[Rob43]

2k1-20817

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7841100

2k3- 6837

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2537958

 

[P-E]

3DMark2001 = 25698 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7899274

3DMark03 = 11486 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2639725

 

[speeduk]

Updated 03 score @ 551/562 clocks = 12,439.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2641863

 

[speeduk]

Bump. Wheres dave these days?

 

[Gamefreak501]

Out comes the old steam driven system:

4278 3D Marks (3DMark2001SE)

 

[malfunkshun]

With my Barton @ 195*11 and an FX5900 i got 5718 marks in 2k3

2K3 score
i havet accurately benched with 2k1 yet, but just to show how things arent always as they seem heres a score of 25142 with the same set up
2k1 score

 

[speeduk]

Originally posted by malfunkshun
With my Barton @ 195*11 and an FX5900 i got 5718 marks in 2k3

2K3 score
i havet accurately benched with 2k1 yet, but just to show how things arent always as they seem heres a score of 25142 with the same set up
2k1 score

LOL @ the 2001 score. Your carchase highdetail is 2x faster than low detail and 6 times faster than my A64 2.3ghz + x800pro XT mod score.

 

[malfunkshun]

yeah man, too funny isnt it, think i get about 15k was too busy laughing at the 25k score when i redid the run

 

[Rojin]

Bit more tweaking now I've taken it all out of the shuttle, 3DMark03: 7574

 

[Overlag]

Originally posted by speeduk
LOL @ the 2001 score. Your carchase highdetail is 2x faster than low detail and 6 times faster than my A64 2.3ghz + x800pro XT mod score.

thats is funny!

low detail
258.6 me
201.3 his


high detail
114.9 me
620.5 his

odd huh


then the rest of the tests have my system leading by a fairly large margin

hmmmmmm

 

[speeduk]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2668876

 

[Thomss]

Nice score

 

[Chris_UK]

Originally posted by speeduk

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2668876

Damn speed your catching me up

 

[happyhero]

here is my best score so far, not bad consudering i am running my system all on air and no OS tweaks like other people, my ram timing are 3.4.3.8. and this is not a new install. core/mem 590/580.

12,777

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2670287

in 2 weeks time i will have a vapo added to my GPU if all goes well.

 

[speeduk]

Chris_uk - Yeh I know mate not quite there though even with vgpu mod.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2671861

13,322 @ 580/570 1.52vgpu. Temps = 29c/53c. Got a 3400 coming next weekend though so should break 13.5k mark.

 

[happyhero]

Originally posted by speeduk
Chris_uk - Yeh I know mate not quite there though even with vgpu mod.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2671861

13,322 @ 580/570 1.52vgpu. Temps = 29c/53c. Got a 3400 coming next weekend though so should break 13.5k mark.

so vmod gives better core stable seed?

 

[happyhero]

Originally posted by speeduk
Chris_uk - Yeh I know mate not quite there though even with vgpu mod.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2671861

13,322 @ 580/570 1.52vgpu. Temps = 29c/53c. Got a 3400 coming next weekend though so should break 13.5k mark.

i notice that the 16 pipes don't do much better than my 12.

 

[speeduk]

Yes it does. With 12 pipes active I could run the core @ 568 stock vgpu no problems but with 16 pipes I could only bench @ 555.

Also the extra pipes only add about 600 marks to the score. I got 11.8k 12 pipes 565/570 and 12.4k @ 555/565.