Prince Phillip Quotes!

strudey · 14 Nov 2007 at 18:07

Well besides Mohinder's Sylar-like capabilities, the average mentalist with a cricket bat could be overpowered by teachers before doing that much damage. Cricket bat is much less dangerous then gun!

peetee · 14 Nov 2007 at 21:51

im fairly sure i could knock a teacher out quite easily with a cricket bat if they tried to stop me murdering aload of kids with it. In a classroom the kids get 1 door to escape out of, and i seriously doubt theyd go breaking windows etc. and its not like windows in schoosl are openable in this day and age

Yer wrong there!

"andy" · 14 Nov 2007 at 22:00

id use rounders bats , one in each hand

G|mp · 14 Nov 2007 at 22:08

I would use a 1 wood, less chance of having a Teacher/kid get near you and a 1 wood with decent swing should fell anyone tbh

Aye im going for a 1 wood

^^Gord^^ · 14 Nov 2007 at 22:15

peter_hutson said:
I love the guy, I suspect he has an amazingly dry sense of humour that most people don't get and are just offended by. On the otherhand he could just be an ignornat toff. Eitherway, the guys a legend.

Indeed! I'm not sure if he is for real or not but a legend his is.

barnettgs · 14 Nov 2007 at 22:16

Funny quotes and I have already read a few of them in the papers so they're probably true!

PardonTheWait · 14 Nov 2007 at 22:20

PurpleDinosaur said:
I seriously doubt you could, remember that kids can run away.

When I walk past my old primary school now, when I walk past the 'gym' part, the building it's in is about ten feet long! Primary schools are like ever so slightly larger doll's houses, I reckon I could batter every kid in there in about three swings.

And re: pistols, there are plenty of pistols manufactured for the purpose of target shooting for sport. Granted, it's not the origin of them, but pistol shooting is a perfectly valid sport imo.

What about javelins? They're for killing people. Ban pointed sticks while we're at it, shall we?

gambitt · 14 Nov 2007 at 22:23

you don't have to reload a cricket bat

PardonTheWait · 14 Nov 2007 at 22:26

If you were in a long enough 'innings' you may need to replace it if it splits though.

I think I would either collapse from exhaustion or be crushed under the weight of the tiny corpses before that happened.

gambitt · 14 Nov 2007 at 22:28

on the other hand you could always beat them with the shotgun when they're in range.

dual purpose weapon

neocon · 14 Nov 2007 at 22:29

isnt he Greek?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Philip,_Duke_of_Edinburgh

crazy greeks

G|mp · 14 Nov 2007 at 22:32

Mohinder said:
If you were in a long enough 'innings' you may need to replace it if it splits though.

I think I would either collapse from exhaustion or be crushed under the weight of the tiny corpses before that happened.

You see thats where the 1 wood wins, you wouldnt get as tired wielding it about and the likelyhood of it splitting or breaking is minimum

Lightweight, highly destructive and gives you more reach, **** you could take a bag with you just in case

strudey · 15 Nov 2007 at 19:59

Mohinder said:
I could easily run into a PE lesson and kill 16 kids with a cricket bat before someone took me down.

(sorry, it's just a good quote)

I still maintain, a gun is a vastly more dangerous weapon than a cricket bat, javelin or bowling ball! It's designed for killing, and is very good at it. You can only use a javelin once. Unless you pulled it out again. But it would be slow and everyone would just run away.

Mad old tory · 15 Nov 2007 at 20:10

Mohinder said:
If you were in a long enough 'innings' you may need to replace it if it splits though.

I think I would either collapse from exhaustion or be crushed under the weight of the tiny corpses before that happened.

Was just thinking that. The Dad of one of Dad's mates used to play cricket for Glos. He came home swearing like a trooper one day because the batsman at the other end had scored a century without a single boundary and he'd been in with him the whole time :eek:

Dangerous-Danni · 15 Nov 2007 at 20:26

peter_hutson said:
Oddly enough, I see a lot of sense in his quote after Dunblane. Insensitive yes, but at least he had the balls (or lack of social skills ) to say it.

lol
That quote makes him sound both stupid and very selfish.
And no you couldn't walk into a primary school gym and kill 16 kids with a cricket bat. :rolleyes:

Since Dunblane massacre access to primary schools is very difficult, you would now have to take on at least a couple of adult teachers before even getting close to any kids. Of course with a gun this would be easy however with a cricket bat it would be far far more difficult.

Next you will be saying the vTech killer could have slaughtered 32 people with a golf club :rolleyes:

They are banned and the vast majority of the U.K agree with it so get over it.

Tom0 · 15 Nov 2007 at 20:39

Phil is a legend fair play, only royal that gets any respect from me.

Tute · 15 Nov 2007 at 21:21

Azagoth said:
A truly great man whose done nothing more than speak his mind. The only reason people find it to be 'wrong' is because they know that if they were in the same situations they would be thinking the exact same things but don't have the balls to say them out loud.

HRH sounds just like the sort of bloke I'd like to sit around a table and knock a few drinks back with!

Well said, and I totally agree.

Digital Punk · 15 Nov 2007 at 21:41

Prince Phillip is a legend.

I love the stuff he comes out with and the fact it gets the PC brigade so up tight.

Vonhelmet · 15 Nov 2007 at 21:43

Azagoth said:
A truly great man whose done nothing more than speak his mind. The only reason people find it to be 'wrong' is because they know that if they were in the same situations they would be thinking the exact same things but don't have the balls to say them out loud.

Speak for yourself, huh?