• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Processor Advice

25 Nov 2004

Im buying a new custom built system, mainly for occasional gaming.

My question is, is an AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @ 2.6Ghz or a AMD AM2 Dual Core 4400+ @ 2.2Ghz a better buy ?
2 Jul 2005
amd offerings are completely useless, don't buy into them. core 2 duo will give you much better performance
22 Jun 2006
AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @ 2.6Ghz or a AMD AM2 Dual Core 4400+ @ 2.2Ghz
If you must go AM2 then the 4400+ is superior to the 4000+, you can add clock speed but you can't add another core. In many current games the 4000+ would be a little faster but in future (and those that support dual cores) the 4400+ will surpass it. You'd also notice a smoother multi-tasking experience and the weight taken off (from background tasks) would nullify the 4000+ speed advantage somewhat (in those apps that don't support dual cores).

In other apps (especially those that take advantage of dual cores) the 4400+ can be significantly faster and from what I've seen the price difference between the two is not that great, so even from a budget rig point of view buying an AM2 4000+ is a questionable move.

Edit: From those clock speeds it looks like the X2 4400+ is a Windsor core with 1MB cache per core, not a 65nm 512KB per core Brisbane, that is another thing that the 64 4000+ won't be able to "add in".
Last edited: