Associate
...and thats all I ever get on my two C2D machines, a little variety would be nice. Only had 1 of each of the other two units bah this unit really is pants.
2bullish said:...and thats all I ever get on my two C2D machines, a little variety would be nice. Only had 1 of each of the other two units bah this unit really is pants.
FAH points are based on the amount of time it took a benchmark computer to complete it. The machine they're using to benchmark is a dual dual core (4-cores total) Xeon-equipped Mac Pro running OS X, Linux, and Windows XP. This 4-processor machine runs the 2610s at the same rate that it runs the rest of the WinSMP WUs but many others, including myself, see dismal performance from the WU on a dual core rig or a dual hyperthreaded proc rig.xgeek said:What is the issue with the 2610s over other WUs?
2bullish said:Been down the Linux route with VMware, total pain in the ass to setup, I'll stick with lower ppd (with the 2610) and no hassle and just have a rant every now and again.
I had no problems at all setting up VMware and Ubuntu on this machine - however with only 1GB RAM it doesn't take much for the machine to start getting a bit iffyshadowscotland said:I agree with the 'tpita' to setup comment but it is actually worth the effort.
Check out the SMP guide thread for my problem install. That said if you what some sleep this week I total agree with sticking with WinSMP.
rich99million said:I had no problems at all setting up VMware and Ubuntu on this machine - however with only 1GB RAM it doesn't take much for the machine to start getting a bit iffy
2bullish said:Been down the Linux route with VMware, total pain in the ass to setup, I'll stick with lower ppd (with the 2610) and no hassle and just have a rant every now and again.
DreederOcUK said:I like 2610s 2758.6PPD is good...
Yus, Dual-Dual 2.66 Macpro with 4gb ram... running Windows XP.kinnison said:Good grief, what's that - a quad core??
DreederOcUK said:Yus, Dual-Dual 2.66 Macpro with 4gb ram... running Windows XP.