A couple of things I'd be interested to know regarding mining are:
- I wonder how much resources mining is taking away from traditional DC projects - i.e. How much resources have been switched from DC to mining and how many people would switch to DC if mining ended?
- I would assume that any profits from mining would be liable for tax. If so, I wonder how many people are actually paying tax or intend to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
I can only talk about my experience here.
I see this as a temporary thing, Im still a seti nut, always will be I guess but after 10 years of crunching, I quite like the idea that I can switch the power to something that will give me money. What I really like even more is that the current state of the miners is a bit like the good old days of boinc, endless tweaking of config files to squeeze that little bit more out of the miner
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c52ff/c52ff17eea75f5fa374792d68c3cb4c06c406d96" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Will I go back, most definitely, the first thing I did before considering my upcoming AMD purchase was to research whether seti was a decent option down the line, if the credit output was poor, then it would have been a no go.
Id imagine that this has hurt DC projects all over the world, (I cant be the only one who has stopped, just look at the team stats!) but I also believe that for mining, there has been a massive influx of people who have never used their machines for this type of thing before, so not every miner used to be a cruncher if you get my drift.
Im still watching my team rank and the moment it is threatened I will switch for a while to protect my ranking, so it does still matter for me, maybe not just as much as it used to, but Im still passionate about the idea of people around the world combining rigs to solve or further the understanding of science, that will never change