PS/BHP

Though it’s still commonly used by carmakers, PS or Pferdestärke (horse-strength in German) was actually replaced by kW as the EU's ‘legal’ measurement of engine power in 1992.

One PS is about 98.6% of a brake horsepower – the two are virtually interchangeable, and PS is sometimes referred to as 'metric horsepower'.
 
Odd that they overhauled it when it didn't make a huge difference to the numbers. For example, the new McLaren 675LT is called '675' as that is it's power measured in PS - thats about 666BHP.

Mabye the idea was that the EU would use it universally but as OP said, I've seen both people and car manufacturers use PS,KW or BHP.
 
Same with the Renault Sport Clio 197 and 200 (perhaps the earlier ones, too?), those figures are quoted in PS.

Their actual bhp is 194 and 197 respectively, if memory serves.
 
Horse Power only really makes sesne if you are also using Cubic Inches to measure capacity!

Back in the dark ages when we had proper engines (:D )

An engine in "standard Tune" would give you for each CI, 1HP and 1FtLb of torque.

So the CI of an engine would tell you everything that you wanted to know!

(NOW you know why a Dodge Charger with a 500CI engine was so bloody awesome! :eek: :D )
 
It gets really confusing when you add in the corrections factors for a given output too!

ISO is different to DIN, so one will make more power than the other after corrected for barometric elevations and temperatures.
 
Horse Power only really makes sesne if you are also using Cubic Inches to measure capacity!

Back in the dark ages when we had proper engines (:D )

An engine in "standard Tune" would give you for each CI, 1HP and 1FtLb of torque.

So the CI of an engine would tell you everything that you wanted to know!

(NOW you know why a Dodge Charger with a 500CI engine was so bloody awesome! :eek: :D )

Only trouble is, American HP is different to British BHP.......

:p
 
Only trouble is, American HP is different to British BHP.......

:p

Its only a rough guide, but nevertheless a good one! :D

(I have a particular fondness for large, relatively low specific performance, engines. They just go, and go, and go! and still have massive torque nevertheless :D)
 
We've always used din on our corrections but Aston Martin wanted them in ISO the other day when I was testing a vantage. They said this was the "new standard" :confused: haha
 
Pointless. If you decide to go for an option of different wheels, say alloys and the rolling diameter is different, you end up with a different wheel horsepower number.

So you don't mind not knowing your drive train loss and that fact that you will never actually kow how much power is at the wheels before you buy? Fair enough.
 
Back
Top Bottom