Soldato
- Joined
- 10 May 2004
- Posts
- 5,232
- Location
- Middlesex
Way to get logical. 

I never said people were overrrating PS2 I said underrating PS3.
PS3 has many very good games. More quality titles than PS2 IMO. But I had more fun with PS2 games at the time. And I think PS2 has a larger amount off games worth playing
Just to let you know, the OP's original question is hugely flawed.
Firstly the PS3 is obviously better than the PS2 at this point in time, better graphics, blu-ray, online and in general games have moved on and things like PS3 COD games are much better than PS2 COD games, provably so.
Now if you're trying to ask us to judge PS2 when it was in it's prime compared to the PS3 as it is now you are asking an impossible question. Firstly memory is not perfect, both information and emotions are corroded over time meaning you cannot always accurately judge how you felt about something in the past, the further back you go the harder this is. I'm also sure everyone has heard of the term 'rose tinted glasses' this is the exact thing I'm talking about.
Furthermore, even if you did accurately recall the feelings you had for those games of yesteryear the biggest factor is you. You have changed over the past 5 or 7 years, your likes, tastes, memories and body have all undergone changes meaning that you are a different person now to how you were in the hay day of the PS2.
This means that unless you can put forward technical or provable data to back up your claim of which is better your conclusion is extremely biased and innacurate.