Nah 45nm chips were no where near that bad - I managed around 45w idle with a Pentium E6500:
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/31879315
1366 chips/platform power consumption on the other hand (although at least they have IPC)
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Q6600 end of life - is a 775 Xeon an option
- Thread starter B@Th*nG
- Start date
Nah 45nm chips were no where near that bad - I managed around 45w idle with a Pentium E6500:
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/31879315
1366 chips/platform power consumption on the other hand (although at least they have IPC)
Nah 45nm chips were no where near that bad - I managed around 45w idle with a Pentium E6500:
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/31879315
1366 chips/platform power consumption on the other hand (although at least they have IPC)
Like all architectures, the spread in cores/clocks/TDP (and idle/load power) is significant - I pulled power figures from two review sites in good standing to confirm and followed accepted rounding practices. 1366 chips power consumption just makes them impractical unless you are putting them in a DC and they fit the permitted power limits, other than that they are dinosaurs and should only be used if you hate whoever pays the power bill.