• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Q6600 Step up?

Or you can wait for the 32nm CPU's from Intel to come out and then you can do a full upgrade. You seem to have more than enough power until Q4 2009 when the 32nm are supposed to be coming out.
 
Thats what I am planing on doing, 32nm i7 and then new build as long as DDR3 and MB prices come into line. Looked into Core2 upgrades for my CPU so i could my existing gear but it just wassent worth it.
 
I would say the Q9550 is a step up in processor terms but if i personally was parting with the cash now i would wait and keep tabs on the I7 parts as many have mentioned.

No point in paying a premium for yesterdays technology.
 
Do the Q9550 generally overclock well, or is it down to specific batch or code?

Yeah , not bad at all. I think many got far more ghz from the Q6600 though ( Eg - stock 2.4ghz OC'ed to 3.8ghz and beyond ). I have mine mostly @ 3.4ghz and at times when transcoding i can raise it to 3.8ghz no problem using Arctic freezer pro. I personally struggle to reach 4ghz stable though. But i have the original C1 stepping. The new ones should be E0 and clock better. :D
 
Are people really using that much CPU processing power? My Q6600 handles everything beautifully.
 
Yeah , not bad at all. I think many got far more ghz from the Q6600 though ( Eg - stock 2.4ghz OC'ed to 3.8ghz and beyond ). I have mine mostly @ 3.4ghz and at times when transcoding i can raise it to 3.8ghz no problem using Arctic freezer pro. I personally struggle to reach 4ghz stable though. But i have the original C1 stepping. The new ones should be E0 and clock better.

Thanks for the info, much appreciated.
 
Back
Top Bottom